EDAboard.com | EDAboard.eu | EDAboard.de | EDAboard.co.uk | RTV forum PL | NewsGroups PL

What is the most powerful audio output tube?

Ask a question - edaboard.com

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - What is the most powerful audio output tube?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

John Fields
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:13 am   



On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:53:16 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:21:36 -0800 (PST), jurb6006_at_gmail.com wrote:

"The bottom line is that you don't know how audio power is measured.
Hint: They don't use sine waves. "

They used to. So more has changed. Fine, if I buy anything I'll measure it myself from now on, but that is unlikely. The old Phase Linear can blow many speakers and run me out of money to not be able to pay the electric bill.

Nonsense. Music isn't a sine wave. Such a measurement is meaningless
for an amplifier intended for audio. To drive industrial equipment,
perhaps.


---
Music is, to a first approximation, the sum and difference of many
sine waves, and if you think that music isn't used used to drive
shaker tables, then you're no less stupid now than you were earlier.

John Fields

Jim Thompson
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:31 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:13:48 -0600, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:53:16 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:

On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:21:36 -0800 (PST), jurb6006_at_gmail.com wrote:

"The bottom line is that you don't know how audio power is measured.
Hint: They don't use sine waves. "

They used to. So more has changed. Fine, if I buy anything I'll measure it myself from now on, but that is unlikely. The old Phase Linear can blow many speakers and run me out of money to not be able to pay the electric bill.

Nonsense. Music isn't a sine wave. Such a measurement is meaningless
for an amplifier intended for audio. To drive industrial equipment,
perhaps.

---
Music is, to a first approximation, the sum and difference of many
sine waves, and if you think that music isn't used used to drive
shaker tables, then you're no less stupid now than you were earlier.

John Fields


What would we do without jurb, bitrex, jasen betts, rickman,
krw, slowman and whit3rd for entertainment ?>:-}

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

John Fields
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:35 am   



On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


Quote:
The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.


Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

John Larkin
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:03 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...


"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."

Quote:

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.


He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer [1] here.

You seem to have a problem with "authority."


[1] if such a thing is possible.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

John Fields
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:07 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:03:35 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."


---
In truth, specifying power in terms of RMS watts is a way of saying:
"I don't know what I'm talking about".
---

Quote:
Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
speciic meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer here, if such a thing is possible.


---
Of course he can, if he has a leg to stand on, even if you fancy
yourself "Chief chimp".
---

>You seem to have a problem with "authority."

---
When a conjecture which I believe to be false is proven to be true, I
have no problem getting behind the authority of the proof.

You, on the other hand, can't abide correction and, consequently, set
yourself up as the arbiter of true and false, as you see it.

John Fields

John Larkin
Guest

Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:57 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:07:14 -0600, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:03:35 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."

---
In truth, specifying power in terms of RMS watts is a way of saying:
"I don't know what I'm talking about".
---

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
speciic meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer here, if such a thing is possible.


---
Of course he can, if he has a leg to stand on, even if you fancy
yourself "Chief chimp".
---

You seem to have a problem with "authority."

---
When a conjecture which I believe to be false is proven to be true, I
have no problem getting behind the authority of the proof.

You, on the other hand, can't abide correction and, consequently, set
yourself up as the arbiter of true and false, as you see it.

John Fields


Design anything cool lately?


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com


Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:31 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.


No surprise. The asshole Fields can't even read.


Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:32 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:57:05 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:07:14 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:03:35 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."

---
In truth, specifying power in terms of RMS watts is a way of saying:
"I don't know what I'm talking about".
---

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
speciic meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer here, if such a thing is possible.


---
Of course he can, if he has a leg to stand on, even if you fancy
yourself "Chief chimp".
---

You seem to have a problem with "authority."

---
When a conjecture which I believe to be false is proven to be true, I
have no problem getting behind the authority of the proof.

You, on the other hand, can't abide correction and, consequently, set
yourself up as the arbiter of true and false, as you see it.

John Fields


Design anything cool lately?


A 555 LED blinker.

John Larkin
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:38 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:31:57 -0500, krw_at_notreal.com wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

No surprise. The asshole Fields can't even read.


He serves as a reminder to me, that when I get to be his age, I don't
become as mean and sour and foul and bitter as he is. Or as useless.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

John Fields
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:48 am   



On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:57:05 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:07:14 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:03:35 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."

---
In truth, specifying power in terms of RMS watts is a way of saying:
"I don't know what I'm talking about".
---

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
speciic meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer here, if such a thing is possible.


---
Of course he can, if he has a leg to stand on, even if you fancy
yourself "Chief chimp".
---

You seem to have a problem with "authority."

---
When a conjecture which I believe to be false is proven to be true, I
have no problem getting behind the authority of the proof.

You, on the other hand, can't abide correction and, consequently, set
yourself up as the arbiter of true and false, as you see it.

John Fields


Design anything cool lately?


---
Yeah, sure, but we're not talking about that, we're talking about your
narcissism, so trying to change the subject is ingenuous.

John Fields

John Fields
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:13 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:31:57 -0500, krw_at_notreal.com wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

No surprise.


---
Of course not.

You've never been more than an insignificant poppycock jousting with a
short, dull lance while seated on your choice of steed, a donkey.
---

>The asshole Fields can't even read.

---
Just more easily refuted nonsense from an amateur narcissist.

John Fields

John Fields
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:36 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:38:13 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:31:57 -0500, krw_at_notreal.com wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

No surprise. The asshole Fields can't even read.

He serves as a reminder to me, that when I get to be his age, I don't
become as mean and sour and foul and bitter as he is. Or as useless.


---
I'll be 79 years old in a few weeks, so you should probably wait to
make judgements until you get there.

In the meantime, regardless of your hate, I design away.

Jim Thompson
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:37 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:38:13 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:31:57 -0500, krw_at_notreal.com wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

No surprise. The asshole Fields can't even read.

He serves as a reminder to me, that when I get to be his age, I don't
become as mean and sour and foul and bitter as he is. Or as useless.


You are a shameful piece-a-shit.

Fields knows more about circuit design than you will ever know.

And krw can't even produce a linear fart, let-alone design a circuit
that works >:-}

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

John Larkin
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:12 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:37:30 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon_at_On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:38:13 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:31:57 -0500, krw_at_notreal.com wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
specific meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

No surprise. The asshole Fields can't even read.

He serves as a reminder to me, that when I get to be his age, I don't
become as mean and sour and foul and bitter as he is. Or as useless.

You are a shameful piece-a-shit.

Fields knows more about circuit design than you will ever know.


555 circuit design? OK, I concede that.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

John Larkin
Guest

Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:17 am   



On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:48:07 -0600, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:57:05 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:07:14 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:03:35 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkinxyxy_at_highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:35:31 -0600, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:06:21 -0500, krw <krw_at_somewhere.com> wrote:


The terms "RMS" and "watt" has a specific meanings. Put the two
together and it describes something that doesn't have meaning in the
physical world. OTOH, if you want to define "RMS watt" to me the mean
distance between Pluto and Uranus, I'm fine with it (as long as you
specify everything). That doesn't mean the term, itself, makes any
sense.

Hmmm...

"RMS power" is a common way of saying "power as measured correctly."

---
In truth, specifying power in terms of RMS watts is a way of saying:
"I don't know what I'm talking about".
---

Seems I've been away a little too long, and here's the KRW cunt trying
to rise out of obscurity and take authority by pretending that "has a
speciic meanings" is good English grammar and that his philosophical
meanderings are other than pedestrian.

He can't "take authority." I'm the Alpha Male Engineer here, if such a thing is possible.


---
Of course he can, if he has a leg to stand on, even if you fancy
yourself "Chief chimp".
---

You seem to have a problem with "authority."

---
When a conjecture which I believe to be false is proven to be true, I
have no problem getting behind the authority of the proof.

You, on the other hand, can't abide correction and, consequently, set
yourself up as the arbiter of true and false, as you see it.

John Fields


Design anything cool lately?

---
Yeah, sure, but we're not talking about that, we're talking about your
narcissism, so trying to change the subject is ingenuous.


This is an electronic design group.

*You* keep popping up with random profane and illogical insults, for
no apparent reason.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - What is the most powerful audio output tube?

Ask a question - edaboard.com

Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
RTV map EDAboard.com map News map EDAboard.eu map EDAboard.de map EDAboard.co.uk map