Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
amdx
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:22 pm
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
MikeK
PS.
No this is not a poll on heaven or hell!
ian field
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:59 pm
"amdx" <amdx_at_knology.net> wrote in message
news:e91d1$4c72ca59$45013905$26701_at_KNOLOGY.NET...
Quote:
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
MikeK
WGAF.
Jon Kirwan
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:04 pm
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:59:07 +0100, "ian field"
<gangprobing.alien_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
Quote:
"amdx" <amdx_at_knology.net> wrote in message
news:e91d1$4c72ca59$45013905$26701_at_KNOLOGY.NET...
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
MikeK
^
|
WGAF. |
|
*----------------------------'
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:04 pm
amdx wrote:
Quote:
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
<http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=44S8iBEAAAAw8MzVWNxO6kU_4Uipg1dLdPDdXUjlbOn07G5UBWfiIg>
Phil Allison
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:48 pm
"amdx"
Quote:
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
..... Phil
Michael Robinson
Guest
Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:38 am
"Phil Allison" <phil_a_at_tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:i4uts3$o1i$1_at_news-01.bur.connect.com.au...
Quote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
.... Phil
Don't be a stranger. This board is dull without your scintillating wit!
Bill Sloman
Guest
Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:40 am
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Win Jin Pom
Guest
Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:59 am
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:48:24 +1000, "Phil Allison" <phil_a_at_tpg.com.au>
wrote:
Quote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Not surprising, given that it's populated largely by septic tanks.
.... Phil
---
news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news_at_netfront.net ---
John Ferrell
Guest
Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:57 pm
It is just a high noise level.....
Filtering & ignoring work for me...
Quote:
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
.... Phil
John Ferrell W8CCW
John Fields
Guest
Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:36 pm
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
---
And you, at least, seem to be confining yourself to just one topic you
know nothing about. ;)
---
JF
John Fields
Guest
Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:36 pm
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:36:13 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
---
And you, at least, seem to be confining yourself to just one topic you
know nothing about.
---
Oops...
Please excuse me, I meant just one off-topic topic.
---
JF
m II
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:19 am
On 10-08-23 04:04 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Quote:
Michael, this one needs watching:
Win Jin Pom wjp1_at_aol.com
It has all the criteria.......
mike
Bill Sloman
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:44 am
On Aug 27, 4:36 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
---
And you, at least, seem to be confining yourself to just one topic you
know nothing about.
Which would be?
I know you don't have a high opinion of my expertise - you mostly lack
the wit to know what I'm talking about - but I'm curious as to what
you might think this "one topic" might be.
It is difficult to thing of a topic that I might know nothing about -
admittedly there are plenty where you don't value what I do know - but
"knowing nothing" isn't quite the same as "knowing something that John
Fields considers to be wrong" and objective outsiders wouldn't equate
the two statements, and soome might find them diametrically opposed.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
John Fields
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:58 pm
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Aug 27, 4:36 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
---
And you, at least, seem to be confining yourself to just one topic you
know nothing about. ;)
Which would be?
I know you don't have a high opinion of my expertise - you mostly lack
the wit to know what I'm talking about - but I'm curious as to what
you might think this "one topic" might be.
---
If you have to ask, then there are two.
---
Quote:
It is difficult to thing of a topic that I might know nothing about -
---
Oh, come now, it can't be _that_ difficult!
---
Quote:
admittedly there are plenty where you don't value what I do know
---
Perhaps more appropriate wording might be: "what I think I know."
---
Quote:
but "knowing nothing" isn't quite the same as "knowing something that John
Fields considers to be wrong"
---
Nor did anyone say it was, which makes it Part I of your straw man.
---
Quote:
and objective outsiders wouldn't equate
the two statements, and soome might find them diametrically opposed.
---
Which is the second part of your straw man.
Goodbye. :-)
---
JF
Bill Sloman
Guest
Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:10 am
On Aug 27, 9:58 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 27, 4:36 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 24, 8:48 am, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"amdx"
Last post I see from Phil was 6/17.
Any idea where he is?
** Right here, checking posts out every day.
Wot a lot of bollocks the NG is full of now.
Oh, I don't know. John Larkin has been talking electronics for a
change, and Phil Hobbs has been active.
---
And you, at least, seem to be confining yourself to just one topic you
know nothing about. ;)
Which would be?
I know you don't have a high opinion of my expertise - you mostly lack
the wit to know what I'm talking about - but I'm curious as to what
you might think this "one topic" might be.
---
If you have to ask, then there are two.
---
As your follow-up post made clear, the fault was in your English
expression - as is so often the case - and not my comprehension of
written English.
Quote:
It is difficult to think of a topic that I might know nothing about -
---
Oh, come now, it can't be _that_ difficult!
---
Technically speaking, it is impossible,because if I could identify it,
I'd know at least one thing about it.
Quote:
admittedly there are plenty where you don't value what I do know
---
Perhaps more appropriate wording might be: "what I think I know."
---
That is the wording that that you would have preferred that I used.
Everybody's opinion of the reliability of their knowledge is
fundamentally subjective, but my data-base has been being tested
against reality for some fifty years now, and has proved to be pretty
reliable.
You seem to have stopped testing yours against reality around the time
the 555 became obsolescent, which would be about thirty years ago.
Quote:
but "knowing nothing" isn't quite the same as "knowing something that John
Fields considers to be wrong"
---
Nor did anyone say it was, which makes it Part I of your straw man.
---
It wasn't an explicit claim, but it is clearly implicit in your post,
because
"just one topic you know nothing about"
clearly implies the existence of a number of topics that you consider
I know nothing about, and yet post about. Since you can't express
yourself very well, we have to ignore the fact that if I knew
absolutely nothing about a topic, I wouldn't be able to post anything
about - as I wouldn't know that it existed - and work out that what
you intended to say was that you disagreed with stuff that I had
posted.
Quote:
and objective outsiders wouldn't equate
the two statements, and soome might find them diametrically opposed.
---
Which is the second part of your straw man.
Sadly, it wasn't a straw man, though you will obviously have trouble
following the logic that demonstrates that you are an inarticulate
Texan nitwit suffering from persistent delusions of competence.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next