Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
John Fields
Guest
Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:02 pm
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 5, 10:28 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Gimme a break, you doddering old fart.
Granting the number of gaps in the logic you have posted in this
thread, you don't need any extra breaks. You do all doddering that's
going on around here, and your pathetic faith in the continuing
utility of the 555 is a particularly blatant dodder.
---
Geez, Bill, if you're going to do serious snippage why don't you snip
the relevant headers as well?
I mean, that would be the logical thing to do...
BTW, where's that schematic I asked for???
---
JF
Bill Sloman
Guest
Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:55 pm
On Sep 5, 10:28 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 04:18:28 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:08 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:26:32 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Sep 1, 10:33 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 31, 9:14 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:58:11 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Aug 31, 9:25 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:23:13 +0000 (UTC), d...@manx.misty.com (Don
Klipstein) wrote:
<snip>
Quote:
Gimme a break, you doddering old fart.
Granting the number of gaps in the logic you have posted in this
thread, you don't need any extra breaks. You do all doddering that's
going on around here, and your pathetic faith in the continuing
utility of the 555 is a particularly blatant dodder.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:14 am
On Sep 6, 11:02 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Sep 5, 10:28 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Gimme a break, you doddering old fart.
Granting the number of gaps in the logic you have posted in this
thread, you don't need any extra breaks. You do all doddering that's
going on around here, and your pathetic faith in the continuing
utility of the 555 is a particularly blatant dodder.
---
Geez, Bill, if you're going to do serious snippage why don't you snip
the relevant headers as well?
I mean, that would be the logical thing to do...
Fiddling with the header doesn't make the thread noticeably more
intelligible. Phil Allison does seem to indulge in this habit, but his
motivation does seem to be to take advantage of all the space
accessible for personal abuse.
Quote:
BTW, where's that schematic I asked for???
Do you own development work. You might consult "The Art of
Electronics" by Horowitz and Hill for the "new" stuff you seem to have
failed to pick up since the NE555 first hit the market. The second
edition was published in 1989, but would appear to cover stuff that
you haven't yet mastered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Electronics
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
