EDAboard.com | EDAboard.eu | EDAboard.de | EDAboard.co.uk | RTV forum PL | NewsGroups PL

T PHL and T PLH: why can they be different?

Ask a question - edaboard.com

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Equipment - T PHL and T PLH: why can they be different?

Merciadri Luca
Guest

Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:54 pm   



Hi,

Consider the propagation time from H (high) to L (low): T PHL.
Consider the propagation time from L to H: T PLH. Why are they
generally different (in value)? Note that I'm not here speaking about
the propagation delay, T PD defined as max(T PHL, T PLH).

Thanks.

Phil Hobbs
Guest

Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:54 pm   



Merciadri Luca wrote:
Quote:
Hi,

Consider the propagation time from H (high) to L (low): T PHL.
Consider the propagation time from L to H: T PLH. Why are they
generally different (in value)? Note that I'm not here speaking about
the propagation delay, T PD defined as max(T PHL, T PLH).

Thanks.

Did you read anything about how the circuits work? Look for asymmetries
in the device properties and circuit topology.

Hint: the physics of PMOS and NMOS devices are not as similar as they
might seem.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058

email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net
http://electrooptical.net

Merciadri Luca
Guest

Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:53 pm   



On Jan 11, 4:12 pm, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSensel...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Quote:
Merciadri Luca wrote:
Hi,

Consider the propagation time from H (high) to L (low): T PHL.
Consider the propagation time from L to H: T PLH. Why are they
generally different (in value)? Note that I'm not here speaking about
the propagation delay, T PD defined as max(T PHL, T PLH).

Thanks.

Did you read anything about how the circuits work?  Look for asymmetries
in the device properties and circuit topology.

Hint: the physics of PMOS and NMOS devices are not as similar as they
might seem.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058

email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) nethttp://electrooptical.net

Thanks!

Rich Grise
Guest

Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:11 am   



Merciadri Luca wrote:
Quote:

Consider the propagation time from H (high) to L (low): T PHL.
Consider the propagation time from L to H: T PLH. Why are they
generally different (in value)? Note that I'm not here speaking about
the propagation delay, T PD defined as max(T PHL, T PLH).

Generally, because bipolar transistors aren't symmetrical, top to

bottom.

These days, with CMOS, that difference is being eroded.

Hope This Helps!
Rich

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Equipment - T PHL and T PLH: why can they be different?

Ask a question - edaboard.com

Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
RTV map EDAboard.com map News map EDAboard.eu map EDAboard.de map EDAboard.co.uk map Opony