Goto page Previous 1, 2
Jeffrey Angus
Guest
Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:02 am
On 11/21/2011 11:47 PM, UnsteadyKen wrote:
Quote:
You're links are broken/segmented.
<http://www.harmankardon.com/EN-US/Products/Pages/ProductDetails.aspx?PID=SOUNDSTICKS3AM>
Does work...
"Praised for its stunning design, the harman kardon® SoundSticks® II
speakers and subwoofer system became a milestone in harman kardon
history when it became part of the permanent collection at New York
City’s Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). Improving on its famous sibling’s
pop-culture appeal, the SoundSticks III system is all that and much
more. As a three-piece, 2.1-channel multimedia sound system, SoundSticks
III brings a new level of excitement to music, games and movies to your
home – with its exceptional sound clarity, enhanced color scheme and
bare minimum of wiring. Beyond its eye-catching appeal, SoundSticks III
continues to be incredibly capable – with 40 watts of dazzling
amplification, a down-firing powered subwoofer, eight full-range
transducers and compatibility with all sorts of multimedia devices. As
the sublime sequel to a prized performer, SoundSticks III is performance
art at its finest."
Only $169
Jeff-1.0
--
"Everything from Crackers to Coffins"
Phil Allison
Guest
Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:07 am
"Jeffrey Angus"
Quote:
** Not from outside the USA it don't.
And the UK one is the same.
How boring of them.
.... Phil
Jeffrey Angus
Guest
Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:22 am
On 11/22/2011 12:07 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
Quote:
Well that sucks, what's the point of that?
Jeff-1.0
--
"Everything from Crackers to Coffins"
Don Pearce
Guest
Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:31 am
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:22:29 -0600, Jeffrey Angus <grendelair_at_aim.com>
wrote:
Quote:
Just need a proxy within the USA - always useful to have one available
for every major country.
d
Rich Grise
Guest
Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:25 pm
DaveC wrote:
Quote:
It looks bog-standard to me. Go ahead and use it and use your mind to go
on to greater things! :-)
Cheers!
Rich
DaveC
Guest
Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:05 am
Quote:
Is *that* why many boomboxes and home stereos(cheap ones) have a tone
knob labeled "Bass< >Treble"?
All I notices with those is that turning it to the left made the sound
muffled and to the right made the sound more tinny/hissy. I didn't
notice that the bass was being boosted when the knob turned left or
that it was being reduced when turned right.
-CC
These pots on the circuit references aren't on a common shaft.
In other words, you can have muffled *and* tinny/hissy!
Dave
ChrisCoaster
Guest
Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:48 am
On Nov 21, 7:03 am, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote:
Unless you want a "tone control" that produces shrill treble and boomy bass,
you need to move the treble corner up, and the bass down.
_________________
Is *that* why many boomboxes and home stereos(cheap ones) have a tone
knob labeled "Bass< >Treble"?
All I notices with those is that turning it to the left made the sound
muffled and to the right made the sound more tinny/hissy. I didn't
notice that the bass was being boosted when the knob turned left or
that it was being reduced when turned right.
-CC
Tauno Voipio
Guest
Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:48 am
On 21.11.11 5:53 , DaveC wrote:
Quote:
I'd like to add a simple op amp-based tone control circuit to my preamp for
desktop speakers& sub that I'm modifying from stock.
This is the simplest I found:
http://www.simplecircuitdiagram.com/2010/02/03/single-op-amp-tone-control/
(I have +/- supplies so I will be eliminating all coupling caps and changing
Vcc/2 to ground.)
What are the positives and negatives to this design?
Better circuit (yet simple)?
Thanks.
This is the classic Baxandall tone control.
There is plenty of material if Googling for
'baxandall'.
--
Tauno Voipio
DaveC
Guest
Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:49 pm
Quote:
This is the classic Baxandall tone control.
There is plenty of material if Googling for
'baxandall'.
Tauno Voipio
Thanks! It really helps to know what it's called...
This page:
<http://sound.westhost.com/dwopa2.htm>
says:
"
This circuit must be driven from a low impedance, so connecting it after the
volume control (for example) is a no-no. Ideally, the output of an opamp will
be the source, thus ensuring the required low impedance.
"
The input to this circuit will be the output of a computer's sound card. I
don't know if it's an opamp driving the output or not.
What do you suggest to insure driving by low impedance? Add a buffer opamp
(gain of 1) at the input of this circuit?
Thanks.
Don Pearce
Guest
Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:19 pm
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:49:48 -0800, DaveC <invalid_at_invalid.net> wrote:
Quote:
This is the classic Baxandall tone control.
There is plenty of material if Googling for
'baxandall'.
Tauno Voipio
Thanks! It really helps to know what it's called... ;-)
This page:
http://sound.westhost.com/dwopa2.htm
says:
"
This circuit must be driven from a low impedance, so connecting it after the
volume control (for example) is a no-no. Ideally, the output of an opamp will
be the source, thus ensuring the required low impedance.
"
The input to this circuit will be the output of a computer's sound card. I
don't know if it's an opamp driving the output or not.
What do you suggest to insure driving by low impedance? Add a buffer opamp
(gain of 1) at the input of this circuit?
Thanks.
The sound card output will be fine for driving this.
d
Phil Allison
Guest
Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:07 am
"Tauno Voipio"
Quote:
** It's not actually.
Seems like a ballsed up version with missing resistors that will be become
unstable at full treble.
Quote:
There is plenty of material if Googling for
'baxandall'.
** And like most stuff on hobby web sites it is bunkum.
The "Baxandall" tone control design was published in Wireless World in
952 - it used valves. The network is different to the one in the link above
and produces variable turnover at both the high and low ends of the range.
http://www.novotone.be/_site/projets/Projet25/Baxandall%20WW.pdf
.... Phil
DaveC
Guest
Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:25 pm
A general question:
Should pots used in the audio tone filter circuits be audio (log) taper? Or
does this apply only to volume pots?
Thanks.
Don Pearce
Guest
Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:30 pm
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:25:37 -0800, DaveC <invalid_at_invalid.net> wrote:
Quote:
A general question:
Should pots used in the audio tone filter circuits be audio (log) taper? Or
does this apply only to volume pots?
Thanks.
Linear
d
Alex Pogossov
Guest
Fri Dec 30, 2011 11:57 am
"DaveC" <invalid_at_invalid.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.CAEF0B2B01AA85A4B04909DF_at_news.eternal-september.org...
Quote:
I'd like to add a simple op amp-based tone control circuit to my preamp
for
desktop speakers & sub that I'm modifying from stock.
This is the simplest I found:
http://www.simplecircuitdiagram.com/2010/02/03/single-op-amp-tone-control/
(I have +/- supplies so I will be eliminating all coupling caps and
changing
Vcc/2 to ground.)
What are the positives and negatives to this design?
Better circuit (yet simple)?
Thanks.
This circuit, "mechanically" lifted from the tube era into op-amp
implementation, has a flaw:
If the treble control is set to maximum, then its gain is not limited at
+20dB at 10...20kHz, but keeps rising as far as the gain-bandwidth product
of the op-amp allows. Input impedance goes down accordingly. It might result
in Hf oscillations in the whole audio chain, even to burning the speakers
out if say you leave input unconnected and close to the speaker cable.
To fix the (potential) problem:
- insert 470R in series with the input 4.7uF capacitor or insert 470R
between the wiper of the treble control and the inverting input of the
op-amp;
- throw a 47pF cap from the op-amp output to the op-amp inverting input.
Goto page Previous 1, 2