Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 354, 355, 356 ... 359, 360, 361 Next
Barry OGrady
Guest
Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:17 am
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:09:01 +0800, Rheilly Phoull
<rheilly_at_bigslong.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 12/27/2011 4:12 PM, dolf wrote:
On 27/12/11 6:30 PM, SG1 wrote:
OFF your choice of Por F.
Yours wasn't a sufficiently long enough sentence, to obtain any
coherence from it.
There was plenty of content in your ramblings, no intelligence
whatsoever. Simply someone getting off with words, a legend in their own
mind. You are a very sad case sunshine !!
That's our Dolt!
==========
dolf
Guest
Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:58 am
Quote:
Quote:
"DM" <d-moss_at_adfa.edu.au> wrote in message
news:BFA03BCC-3543-4798-897E-551500E1AFC8%d-moss_at_adfa.edu.au...
The ABC is headlining "Secrecy surrounds Kim's state funeral". Yet
the event is being broadcast live on TV and the article
mentions hundreds of thousands of official mourners, a
motorcade through public streets and a national 3 minutes
silence at noon to be observed by 6 million people.
It actually says that they don't know what will happen at
all.
I'm sure people in NK know exactly what their role in the
event is.
But nobody outside NK does. That is why it is called a "secret".
Hmm, a secret only 6 million people are in on?
No.
6 million people don't know the details of the funeral.
They said, he had penchant for foreign wine!
On 27/12/11 10:09 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
Quote:
On 12/27/2011 4:12 PM, dolf wrote:
On 27/12/11 6:30 PM, SG1 wrote:
OFF your choice of Por F.
Yours wasn't a sufficiently long enough sentence, to obtain any
coherence from it.
There was plenty of content in your ramblings, no intelligence
whatsoever. Simply someone getting off with words, a legend in their
own mind. You are a very sad case sunshine !!
And I do what I do via that noumenal reality: I've had discussions on
how it was possible, like music playing in the background whilst the
sexual act occurs, to project not only oneself but to harmonize the
mind, being and soul and bring forth within a person, a reasonance with
these essential characteristics of attributed time. And if the mind is
sufficiently attenuated to this fabric in the here and now and to some
other designated point in time within its circular reality. With just a
little action here and there a little effort as cognised references
within the continuum which lubricate the motion, it ought to be possible
within any given instance of time, to transcendentally transition or
move one’s mind--to say nothing of what pathway the soul takes as entry
into the afterlife or indeed what holds it back.
Nous: #19
Time: 18:25 hrs
Date: 2011.12.28
Torah: #10 #8 #6 %81 = #24
Dao: Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity
Tetra: #58 - Gathering In
I-Ching:H57 - Gentle Penetration
Latin: Recordabilis {God who knows all things} Alt: Haziel {Seeing of God} {
1. PROTECTOR OF PRINCES, SERVES TO UNCOVER PLOTS & TRAITORS
2. IN UNDOING THEIR PLANS
3. JUST RULERS
4. Ouestucati
}
David {Well-beloved, dear}
North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il’s Funeral of 28 December 2011
"Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined
{anetazo-examine [G426]: #429} him: and the chief captain also was
afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound
him." [Acts 22:29]
"And the princes of the children of Ammon {a people; the son of my
people} said unto Hanun {gracious; merciful} their Lord, Thinkest thou
that David {well-beloved, dear} doth honour thy father, that he hath
sent comforters unto thee? hath not David rather sent his servants unto
thee, to search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} the city, and to spy it
out, and to overthrow it?" [2Samuel 10:3]
"And Solomon {peaceable; perfect; one who recompenses} left all the
vessels unweighed, because they were exceeding many: neither was the
weight of the brass found {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out." [1Kings 7:47]
"But the princes of the children of Ammon said to Hanun, Thinkest thou
that David doth honour thy father, that he hath sent comforters unto
thee? are not his servants come unto thee for to search {chaqar-search
[H2713]: #374}, and to overthrow, and to spy out the land?" [1Chronicles
19:3]
"Thus Solomon made all these vessels in great abundance: for the weight
of the brass could not be found {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out."
[2Chronicles 4:18]
"Lo this, we have searched {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} it, so it is;
hear it, and know thou it for thy good." [Job 5:27]
"Is it good that he should search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} you out?
or as one man mocketh another, do ye so mock him?" [Job 13:9]
"He setteth an end to darkness, and searcheth {chaqar-search [H2713]:
#374} out all perfection: the stones of darkness, and the shadow of
death." [Job 28:3]
"Then did he see it, and declare it; he prepared it, yea, and searched
{chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} it out." [Job 28:27]
"I was a father to the poor: and the cause which I knew not I searched
{chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out." [Job 29:16]
"Behold, I waited for your words; I gave ear to your reasons, whilst ye
searched {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out what to say." [Job 32:11]
"Shall not God search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} this out? for he
knoweth the secrets of the heart." [Psalm 44:21]
"To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. O LORD, thou hast searched
{chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, and known me." [Psalm 139:1]
"Search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, O God, and know my heart: try
me, and know my thoughts:" [Psalm 139:23]
"He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour
cometh and searcheth {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} him." [Proverbs 18:17]
"They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek {chaqar-search
[H2713]: #374} mixed wine." [Proverbs 23:30]
"It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is
to search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out a matter." [Proverbs 25:2]
"The rich man is wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath
understanding searcheth {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} him out."
[Proverbs 28:11]
"And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people
knowledge; yea, he gave good heed, and sought {chaqar-search [H2713]:
#374} out, and set in order many proverbs." [Ecclesiastes 12:9]
I know just how wonderful it is to be able to come back to a place, or
to a time and for someone to share their memories of past
experience--that neither my boy nor I have to feel any sense of shame in
having transgressed values which are most sacred as our ANZAC tradition.
That we were not flotsam in a crowd of dispassionate people forgotten
with the passage of time, journeying amongst inaccessible buildings
which alone remain after we are gone.
But you are antagonistic to those traditions and there will be no joyous
peace of soul for you.
The force of public opinion about the truth of this story, will
invariably have a consequence upon you.
SG1
Guest
Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:10 pm
"dolf" <dolfboek_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KDCKq.961$%E2.955_at_viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
Quote:
North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il’s Funeral of 28 December 2011
Should that not read Kin Jong DEAD, he is past being Il?????
Rheilly Phoull
Guest
Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:06 am
On 12/28/2011 6:17 PM, Barry OGrady wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:09:01 +0800, Rheilly Phoull
rheilly_at_bigslong.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2011 4:12 PM, dolf wrote:
On 27/12/11 6:30 PM, SG1 wrote:
OFF your choice of Por F.
Yours wasn't a sufficiently long enough sentence, to obtain any
coherence from it.
There was plenty of content in your ramblings, no intelligence
whatsoever. Simply someone getting off with words, a legend in their own
mind. You are a very sad case sunshine !!
That's our Dolt!
==========
Jeez! what a fruitcake !! Does he have his own mushroom farm or something ??
dolf
Guest
Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:04 am
On 28/12/11 10:10 PM, SG1 wrote:
Quote:
"dolf"<dolfboek_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KDCKq.961$%E2.955_at_viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il’s Funeral of 28 December 2011
Should that not read Kin Jong DEAD, he is past being Il?????
I wonder what they thought of my eulogy, as computer categories of
understanding for the day which the had words of equivalent value;
EXAMINE (viz a viz the Jackal of Egyptology weighing his heart), making
it compatible with Israel's earliest kings (1000 BCE), their Daoist
tradition (I CHING / DAO TE CHING), and because of rational number:
Communism!
They said, he had penchant for foreign wine!
"Shall not God search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} this out? for he
knoweth the secrets of the heart." [Psalm 44:21]
"To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. O LORD, thou hast searched
{chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, and known me." [Psalm 139:1]
"Search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, O God, and know my heart: try
me, and know my thoughts:" [Psalm 139:23]
"He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour
cometh and searcheth {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} him." [Proverbs 18:17]
"They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek {chaqar-search
[H2713]: #374} mixed wine." [Proverbs 23:30]
"It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is
to search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out a matter." [Proverbs 25:2]
Good luck getting into Westminster Abbey when the Queen drops off her
perch then.
- dolf
--
www.grapple369.com
dolf
Guest
Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:05 am
On 29/12/11 10:06 AM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
Quote:
On 12/28/2011 6:17 PM, Barry OGrady wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:09:01 +0800, Rheilly Phoull
rheilly_at_bigslong.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2011 4:12 PM, dolf wrote:
On 27/12/11 6:30 PM, SG1 wrote:
OFF your choice of Por F.
Yours wasn't a sufficiently long enough sentence, to obtain any
coherence from it.
There was plenty of content in your ramblings, no intelligence
whatsoever. Simply someone getting off with words, a legend in their own
mind. You are a very sad case sunshine !!
That's our Dolt!
==========
Jeez! what a fruitcake !! Does he have his own mushroom farm or
something ??
I wonder what they thought of my eulogy, as computer categories of
understanding for the day which then had words of equivalent value;
EXAMINE (viz a viz the Jackal of Egyptology weighing his heart), making
it compatible with Israel's earliest kings (1000 BCE), their Daoist
tradition (I CHING / DAO TE CHING), and because of rational number:
Communism!
They said, he had penchant for foreign wine!
"Shall not God search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} this out? for he
knoweth the secrets of the heart." [Psalm 44:21]
"To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. O LORD, thou hast searched
{chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, and known me." [Psalm 139:1]
"Search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} me, O God, and know my heart: try
me, and know my thoughts:" [Psalm 139:23]
"He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour
cometh and searcheth {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} him." [Proverbs 18:17]
"They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek {chaqar-search
[H2713]: #374} mixed wine." [Proverbs 23:30]
"It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is
to search {chaqar-search [H2713]: #374} out a matter." [Proverbs 25:2]
Good luck getting into Westminster Abbey when the Queen drops off her
perch then.
- dolf
--
www.grapple369.com
Sylvia Else
Guest
Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:03 am
On 22/01/2012 5:53 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
Quote:
Heated Dam Submerged Stirling Engine
[---]
[-|-]____ Transparent Pool Cover
[-|-]******* Hot Water
[---]*******
Use helix copper pipes wrapped around the end Plates.
Pump in hot water to the submerged Plate from the surrounding dam
water,
Pump in cold water to the above water Plate from a nearby non-heated
dam.
What's the required flow rate?
Pipes and pumps cost money.
Sylvia.
Graham Cooper
Guest
Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:53 am
Heated Dam Submerged Stirling Engine
[---]
[-|-]____ Transparent Pool Cover
[-|-]******* Hot Water
[---]*******
Use helix copper pipes wrapped around the end Plates.
Pump in hot water to the submerged Plate from the surrounding dam
water,
Pump in cold water to the above water Plate from a nearby non-heated
dam.
Graham Cooper
Guest
Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:16 am
On Jan 22, 5:03 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
Quote:
On 22/01/2012 5:53 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
Heated Dam Submerged Stirling Engine
[---]
[-|-]____ Transparent Pool Cover
[-|-]******* Hot Water
[---]*******
Use helix copper pipes wrapped around the end Plates.
Pump in hot water to the submerged Plate from the surrounding dam
water,
Pump in cold water to the above water Plate from a nearby non-heated
dam.
What's the required flow rate?
Pipes and pumps cost money.
Sylvia.
How much can we make with 1000Watts/m2 * 50% * 6 hours * 1 hectare *
5% * 50%?
50% heat loss, 50% generator efficiency, 5% stirling engine
efficiency?
Herc
George152
Guest
Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:57 pm
On 1/22/2012 8:03 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
Quote:
On 22/01/2012 5:53 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
Heated Dam Submerged Stirling Engine
[---]
[-|-]____ Transparent Pool Cover
[-|-]******* Hot Water
[---]*******
Use helix copper pipes wrapped around the end Plates.
Pump in hot water to the submerged Plate from the surrounding dam
water,
Pump in cold water to the above water Plate from a nearby non-heated
dam.
What's the required flow rate?
Pipes and pumps cost money.
Sylvia.
The best way to get the effect herc is claiming is with a lot of black
plastic (Alkathene) pipe with a nonreturn valve on one end and a filter
on the other.
Lay the pipe over the roof.
Fill pipe with water (prime) and drop both ends in the pool.
No pumps needed
Graham Cooper
Guest
Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:50 pm
On Jan 23, 5:57 am, George152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
Quote:
On 1/22/2012 8:03 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 22/01/2012 5:53 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
Heated Dam Submerged Stirling Engine
[---]
[-|-]____ Transparent Pool Cover
[-|-]******* Hot Water
[---]*******
Use helix copper pipes wrapped around the end Plates.
Pump in hot water to the submerged Plate from the surrounding dam
water,
Pump in cold water to the above water Plate from a nearby non-heated
dam.
What's the required flow rate?
Pipes and pumps cost money.
Sylvia.
The best way to get the effect herc is claiming is with a lot of black
plastic (Alkathene) pipe with a nonreturn valve on one end and a filter
on the other.
Lay the pipe over the roof.
Fill pipe with water (prime) and drop both ends in the pool.
No pumps needed
Then you could skip the pool of water, and just pipe the heated water
to the end of the stirling engine.
The stirling engine exhanges the heat between the hot and cold pipes
in order to pump the cylinder.... which drives the generator.
A hectare of black pipe is more exxy though.
A lot more practical though.
If you could use the hot water rising to move the water through a grid
of pipes, spread over a small incline bank to keep hot water moving to
the end of the engine, and the cooled down water coming out of the
engine back into the pipes for more heating.
A pool of water could keep it running at night by storing heat.
The cold end might need the cool water pumped with a small motor.
A small prototype using Alkathene pipe might be a start.
A second prototype could use an insulated tank of water to keep the
engine running overnight.
Herc
John-Melb
Guest
Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:33 am
On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
On 10/02/2012 9:14 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 9, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 9/02/2012 11:03 AM, John-Melb wrote:> On Feb 9, 10:49 am, Tankfixer<paul.carr...@gmail.c00m> wrote:
In article<4f2fc...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, - keithr ke...@nowhere.com.au
spouted !
I have spent 6 years of my life in the US, I have travelled all over
that country, I was never attacked. I know a lot of Americans, and none
of those have ever been attacked either.
So why do you hold this pathalogical delusional fear of firearms ?
Because Keefy is a dedicated "anti", he doesn't believe you have the
same rights as an anti-gun zealot, because, you own guns.
Seems we are perfectly safe owning them.
OK John show me one post where I have said that guns should be banned,
or even that Australia's gun laws should be tightened.
good luck, you'll need it.
To quote your dear friend "read what I wrote"
I said you're a dedicated anti, and you're the worst kind of anti,
with you, it's not about the guns, it's about the people who own the
guns. you have no problem with an anti-gun zealot posting his anti-gun
and antigun owner bile wherever he wants, but get very upset at the
thought of alternative opinion being posted on the same forum.
You do not believe that rights afforded to everybody else in society,
rights like freedom of speech, rights that you're prepared to
recognise when used by you anti-gun mates, should be afforded to
someone who owns guns.
You view some one who owns a gun a some sort of second class citizen.
Historically, one term for beliefs very similar to your's once, and in
one part of this world, had a name, the term was Untermenschen.
Sorry Keefy, I refuse to be your Untermenschen, and you have real
problems with that.
Give my regards to Dorothy
No John, since you are too thick to have understood in the past, I'll
try once again to get through your thick skull, I am not in the least
afraid of guns, I quite like them, I have nothing against gun owners. I
do though have a particular dislike for arseholes, and you have proved
yourself to be one of those par excellence by shoving your views down
the throats of those who were not in the least interested in hearing
them. If you are happy being an arsehole, so be it, but at least keep it
to yourself.
Let's refresh you memory Keefy.
An anti-gun zealot was posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
diatribes in your little corner of Usenet.
No one was telling him his comments were off topic, no one was telling
him to take it elsewhere.
I began to respond to these rants, I immediately came under a barrage
of abuse, I was a queer coward, your favourite anti gun zealot was a
long standing and highly respected poster.
Don't give me your bullshit about changing opinions, you and others on
aus.electronics had you opinions well and truly made up well before I
ever posted there.
An abusive wanker like you tells me I'm an arsehole, and you say that
like it's a bad thing? Havinig a wanker like you tell me I'm an
arsehole obviously means I'm doing something right as a human being.
John-Melb
Guest
Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:40 pm
On Feb 13, 11:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
On 13/02/2012 5:33 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 10/02/2012 9:14 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 9, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 9/02/2012 11:03 AM, John-Melb wrote:> On Feb 9, 10:49 am, Tankfixer<paul.carr...@gmail.c00m> wrote:
In article<4f2fc...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, - keithr ke...@nowhere.com..au
spouted !
I have spent 6 years of my life in the US, I have travelled all over
that country, I was never attacked. I know a lot of Americans, and none
of those have ever been attacked either.
So why do you hold this pathalogical delusional fear of firearms ?
Because Keefy is a dedicated "anti", he doesn't believe you have the
same rights as an anti-gun zealot, because, you own guns.
Seems we are perfectly safe owning them.
OK John show me one post where I have said that guns should be banned,
or even that Australia's gun laws should be tightened.
good luck, you'll need it.
To quote your dear friend "read what I wrote"
I said you're a dedicated anti, and you're the worst kind of anti,
with you, it's not about the guns, it's about the people who own the
guns. you have no problem with an anti-gun zealot posting his anti-gun
and antigun owner bile wherever he wants, but get very upset at the
thought of alternative opinion being posted on the same forum.
You do not believe that rights afforded to everybody else in society,
rights like freedom of speech, rights that you're prepared to
recognise when used by you anti-gun mates, should be afforded to
someone who owns guns.
You view some one who owns a gun a some sort of second class citizen.
Historically, one term for beliefs very similar to your's once, and in
one part of this world, had a name, the term was Untermenschen.
Sorry Keefy, I refuse to be your Untermenschen, and you have real
problems with that.
Give my regards to Dorothy
No John, since you are too thick to have understood in the past, I'll
try once again to get through your thick skull, I am not in the least
afraid of guns, I quite like them, I have nothing against gun owners. I
do though have a particular dislike for arseholes, and you have proved
yourself to be one of those par excellence by shoving your views down
the throats of those who were not in the least interested in hearing
them. If you are happy being an arsehole, so be it, but at least keep it
to yourself.
Let's refresh you memory Keefy.
sarcasm> Thank you John, I am getting old, I forget things </sarcasm
An anti-gun zealot was posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
diatribes in your little corner of Usenet.
So you felt that you had to shove in your pro-gun diatribe wherever he was.
So, in your opinion I don't have the right to respond, thank you for
proving my point, the case for the defence rests, your honor.
Quote:
No one was telling him his comments were off topic, no one was telling
him to take it elsewhere.
Nobody cared, nobody listened, can't you get that into your thick skull?
They cared enough to abuse me and my responses, whilst telling me all
about the long standing and highly respected poster.
Quote:
I began to respond to these rants, I immediately came under a barrage
of abuse, I was a queer coward, your favourite anti gun zealot was a
long standing and highly respected poster.
You have little difficulty handing out the abuse, but you get very
precious if it gets handed back to you, that is hypocrisy of the worst
kind.
I have no problem with giving or receiving abuse when it is deserved,
I have a real problem with prejudice, I was being abused not for what
I had done, but for having an opinion contrary to that held by your
long standing and highly respected poster.
Quote:
You put out the lie that I was "Anti-gun" (whatever that means) to try
and scrape up support for your arseholery, it seems that that has failed
so now I am supposed to be "Anti-gunowner", really I am just
anti-arsehole, but you can't admit that to yourself because it would
harm your precious ego.
Yes, Trevor claims to not understand what the term "anti-gun" means
too, no surprises there.
Quote:
Don't give me your bullshit about changing opinions, you and others on
aus.electronics had you opinions well and truly made up well before I
ever posted there.
You could have taken a vote before you barged in, probably 5% in favour
of Wilson's opinion, 5% in favour of yours and 90% couldn't give a shit
either way, now you'd probably have 75% against you. Well done princess,
you really have advanced your cause.
More likely, given the responses I received, 85% in favour of Wilson's
opinion, 15% to frightened to give their own for fear of being
vilified by you long standing and highly respected poster or his
mates.
Quote:
An abusive wanker like you tells me I'm an arsehole, and you say that
like it's a bad thing? Havinig a wanker like you tell me I'm an
arsehole obviously means I'm doing something right as a human being.
You get called an arsehole because you behave like one and every time
you do, it becomes less likely that gun owners in Australia will get a
better deal.
Like I said a long time ago, its not the message that is the problem,
the problem is the messenger who is an abusive arsehole.
BTW, being an arsehole means that you are doing nothing right as a human
being.
I'm obviously getting up your nose, after all, you only post here to
"annoy the crap" out of me, therefore I must be doing something right.
John-Melb
Guest
Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:44 pm
On Feb 13, 11:46 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
On 13/02/2012 5:20 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 13, 4:22 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 10/02/2012 7:28 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 7, 7:42 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 5/02/2012 10:00 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Feb 2, 9:48 pm, "Spartan613"<nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
Maybe because it actually happens.
Fuck. you're an idiot.
Other posters should realise, when responding to Keefy's posts that
they are dealing with a dedicated "anti"
Other posters should realise, when responding to the princesses's posts
that he doesn't know his arse from his elbow.
Keefy is one of those who's is of the opinion that gun owners
shouldn't have the same rights as anti-gun zealot's like Trevor
Tosspot. Rights like freedom of speech.
Keefy is one of those who's is of the opinion that people like John who
force their unwanted opinions on people with no interest in this sort of
"Discussion" should have the piss taken out of them unmercifully. John
having a rather thin skin gets terribly upset about that. Poor sensitive
little soul.
But, of course this doesn't apply when Trevor Tosspot is the one
giving the unwanted opinions, unless your inferring that the people on
aus.electronics want to hear the rantings of an anti-gun zealot
Here we go again, same shit different day. Nobody was taking any notice
of him until you had to go and stick your opinions in. If you hadn't
started forcing your unwanted opinions there, nobody would have even
noticed. Of course, after your boorish behaviour, people may have
started thinking that he had a point there.
Good on John, it was what is commonly known as an own goal.
Bullshit, if you'll remember at the time, I was advised that this anti-
gun zealot was one of aus.electronics "long standing and highly
respected" posters, yep, even when he was spilling his anti-gun and
anti gun-owner bile.
When you talk of spilling bile John, you're quite handy at it yourself.
Expressions like "Word vomit" mean anything to you? To complain of the
actions of others while doing the same is hypocrisy one of the lowest
forms of human endeavour.
No, I would say hate and prejudice is one of the lowest forms of human
endeavour.
The belief that someone is entitled to voice their opinion, but
someone with a differing opinion is not, and the belief they should be
abused and vilified for doing so, is prejudice.
John-Melb
Guest
Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:00 am
Found this for you Keefy,
====================On Sep 26 2009, 10:28 pm, John - Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 25, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates from APG swarming all over the place again.
Sorry Keefy, too late.
It's interesting to note that Keefy isn't concerned about Trevor's
anti-gun rants appearing onaus.electronics, he's concerned that an
alternative viewpoint may appear.
Doesn't surprise me in the least.
========================You will note that Keefy doesn't have a problem with totally off-topic
anti-gun word vomit appearing on places like aus.electronics, except,
that it may result in alternative viewpoints also appearing.
Keefy (like Trevor Tosspot) claims not to know what the term "anti-
gun" means and claims he is not "anti-gun" or "anti-gun owner".
However, he doesn't believe that gun owners should have the same
rights to voice their opinion or voice those opinions in the same
places/formats as anti-gun zealots, he therefore views gun owners as
second class citizens with less rights than anti-gun zealots.
The word you're looking for Keefy is "Untermensch".
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 354, 355, 356 ... 359, 360, 361 Next
