Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Archimedes' Lever
Guest
Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:44 pm
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:57:15 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris_at_invalid.invalid> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:04:51 -0700, Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:27:36 -0700, Fred Abse
excretatauris_at_invalid.invalid> wrote:
Or landing on the moon .. oops!.
Wrong. It was a Mars lander, you senile old fart.
And it was US over Metric, not a decimal position.
It was a *hypothetical* suggestion.
Don't imply meaning where none was intended.
Well, there certainly was an actual event, Mr. Lack-of-intentions. It
shows.
Proteus IIV
Guest
Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:48 pm
On Mar 14, 3:11 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:51:51 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:04:25 -0700, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
and you'd have made the first step to
being a member of this group, and not what you now are.
THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM, JOHN. YOU DO NOT GET TO DECLARE WHO HAS OR HAS
NOT MADE SOME IMAGINED STEP.
FUCK YOU, BOY!
I guess you're just another usenet pain slut who enjoys continual
public mockery. It's a pretty common syndrome.
Enjoy.
John
HE HAS BEEN AROUND MOST LIKELY PICKED UP SEVERAL INCURABLE VIRTUAL
DESEASES
HE LIKES GETTING HIS ANAL APERTURE PROBED AS WELL
I AM PROTEUS
Archimedes' Lever
Guest
Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:37 pm
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:48:05 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
HE HAS BEEN AROUND MOST LIKELY PICKED UP SEVERAL INCURABLE VIRTUAL
DESEASES
HE LIKES GETTING HIS ANAL APERTURE PROBED AS WELL
I AM PROTEUS
Oh boy. The RoyTard has invaded yet another group.
John Larkin
Guest
Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:30 pm
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:48:05 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 14, 3:11 pm, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:51:51 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
Zarathus...@thusspoke.org> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:04:25 -0700, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
and you'd have made the first step to
being a member of this group, and not what you now are.
THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM, JOHN. YOU DO NOT GET TO DECLARE WHO HAS OR HAS
NOT MADE SOME IMAGINED STEP.
FUCK YOU, BOY!
I guess you're just another usenet pain slut who enjoys continual
public mockery. It's a pretty common syndrome.
Enjoy.
John
HE HAS BEEN AROUND MOST LIKELY PICKED UP SEVERAL INCURABLE VIRTUAL
DESEASES
HE LIKES GETTING HIS ANAL APERTURE PROBED AS WELL
I AM PROTEUS
No, you're just another juvenile dreamer with no marketable skills.
John
John Larkin
Guest
Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:29 pm
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:24:35 -0800, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
<Zarathustra_at_thusspoke.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:52:30 -0800, Fred Abse
excretatauris_at_invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:00:46 -0800, Fred Abse wrote:
1/(30*10^9) = 10^-9/30 = 10^-10/3 = 0.33*10^10 = 33*10^-12
1/(30*10^9) = 10^-9/30 = 10^-10/3 = 0.33*10^-10 = 33*10^-12
Typo, sorry,
Wavelength.
30GHz = 1cm
300GHz = 1mm
You all three need to try again.
do a google search, you retarded twits.
wavelength at 30 GHz
Or just type out the whole query:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_long_does_it_take_light_to_travel_one_centimeter
Pretty simple shit. You dopes are wrong.
The issue isn't wavelength, it's period.
John
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
