Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 64, 65, 66 Next
Rick Cavallaro
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:09 am
On Aug 17, 7:35 pm, John Larkin whined:
Quote:
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
I thought we already established that I have a life and a pile of
accomplishments, and you're a jealous little prick. Do we have to go
over this again with smaller words?
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:24 am
John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
That shouldn't be hard, for some minutes at least. The Tesla
accelerates like mad. Batteries and motors can make a lot of power for
a little while.
And a lot of smoke, soon after.
JW
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:18 am
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:15:54 -0700 (PDT) WallyWallWhackr
<gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote in Message id:
<564c982e-0f7d-4b9b-ba62-2a51d38a4be1_at_l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>:
Quote:
On Aug 17, 4:51 am, "amdx" <a...@knology.net> wrote:
New topic: RETARDS CONSTANTLY CHANGING TOPIC HEADERS LIKE THE DUMB
LITTLE PLAYGROUND IDIOTS (THEY/YOU ARE)
Good job, retard. NOT!
Lost another account at Google eh?
Heh.
John Fields
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:32 am
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
---
JF
John Fields
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:52 am
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:22:01 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:09:34 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.spork_at_gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:35 pm, John Larkin whined:
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
I thought we already established that I have a life and a pile of
accomplishments, and you're a jealous little prick. Do we have to go
over this again with smaller words?
Whata man. We stand in awe before you. Now go away.
---
Why can't you give anyone the credit and respect due them?
I think we _all_ know the answer to that one.
---
JF
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:40 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:52:55 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:22:01 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:09:34 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.spork_at_gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:35 pm, John Larkin whined:
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
I thought we already established that I have a life and a pile of
accomplishments, and you're a jealous little prick. Do we have to go
over this again with smaller words?
Whata man. We stand in awe before you. Now go away.
---
Why can't you give anyone the credit and respect due them?
The way you ger respect in an electronics design newsgroup is by
talking about electronics.
Hint hint.
John
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:43 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
John
John Fields
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:26 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:43:35 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
---
Why don't you join up?
That is, apply, anyway, after you're toilet trained.
---
JF
John Fields
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:28 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:43:35 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
---
Subject change and dodge?
Why not just answer the question: "Who's the one trick pony now?"?
---
JF
John Fields
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:35 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:40:35 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:52:55 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:22:01 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:09:34 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.spork_at_gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:35 pm, John Larkin whined:
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
I thought we already established that I have a life and a pile of
accomplishments, and you're a jealous little prick. Do we have to go
over this again with smaller words?
Whata man. We stand in awe before you. Now go away.
---
Why can't you give anyone the credit and respect due them?
The way you ger respect in an electronics design newsgroup is by
talking about electronics.
---
Yeah, right.
"Talking about electronics" is your standard line for explaining away
90% of the problems here, and yet 90% of the time you and your ilk
create the problems by engaging in totally off-topic bullshit.
Try practicing what you preach, sometime, hypocrite.
---
JF
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:38 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:35:10 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:40:35 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:52:55 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:22:01 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:09:34 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.spork_at_gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:35 pm, John Larkin whined:
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
I thought we already established that I have a life and a pile of
accomplishments, and you're a jealous little prick. Do we have to go
over this again with smaller words?
Whata man. We stand in awe before you. Now go away.
---
Why can't you give anyone the credit and respect due them?
The way you ger respect in an electronics design newsgroup is by
talking about electronics.
---
Yeah, right.
"Talking about electronics" is your standard line for explaining away
90% of the problems here, and yet 90% of the time you and your ilk
create the problems by engaging in totally off-topic bullshit.
Don't you go insulting my ilk. She's a nice, sweet animal, as long as
you keep enough carpet cleaner around.
John
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:46 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:28:22 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:43:35 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
---
Subject change and dodge?
Why not just answer the question: "Who's the one trick pony now?"?
I design all sorts of electronics, and electronic design involves
thermal issues, electromagnetics, optics, physics, lasers, packaging,
machining, jet engines, IC fab, programming, manufacturing, financial
issues, all sorts of stuff. It changes constantly and it's fun.
Your hero and his faithful co-sidekick Tonto seem to have a single
obsession, really just one simple trick, and use it like a bar bet,
prowling newsgroups off-topic looking for people to challenge and
insult. Seems a huge waste of time for such awesomely wonderful and
talented people with all those awards.
John
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:32 pm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:26:04 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:43:35 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
---
Why don't you join up?
That is, apply, anyway, after you're toilet trained.
---
JF
AlwaysWrong's poop fetish seems to have, so to speak, rubbed off on
you.
Why are so many guys so obsessed with things fecal? Yuk.
John
Nunya
Guest
Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:32 am
On Aug 18, 3:18 am, JW <n...@dev.null> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:15:54 -0700 (PDT) WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_...@cox.net> wrote in Message id:
564c982e-0f7d-4b9b-ba62-2a51d38a4...@l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>:
On Aug 17, 4:51 am, "amdx" <a...@knology.net> wrote:
New topic: RETARDS CONSTANTLY CHANGING TOPIC HEADERS LIKE THE DUMB
LITTLE PLAYGROUND IDIOTS (THEY/YOU ARE)
Good job, retard. NOT!
Lost another account at Google eh?
Heh.
You're a goddamned idiot, nulskull.
The day your IQ rises above 25 I'll stop posting about how utterly
fucking retarded you, and your petty fucktard ilk are.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, JW, you fucking absolute
retard!
John Fields
Guest
Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:55 am
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:46:52 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:28:22 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:43:35 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:32:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:22 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT), WallyWallWhackr
gonna_get_you_boy_at_cox.net> wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT), Rick Cavallaro
rick.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:52 pm, John Larkin wrote:
But mph-lbs?
Good call - if you can't find any actual errors in the analysis, bitch
about the units.
Is this trick going to be your life's work?
John
He sure busted you at one of the things you do best.
Bwuahahahahaha!
What I do best is design electronics. He doesn't. You don't either.
He apparently knows only one trick, plays it everywhere, and it isn't
even his trick.
---
AIUI he has several electronically-related patents, is active in many
fields, and has an Emmy to boot.
You design electronics.
Who's the one trick pony now?
Now he has *two* faithful sidekicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidekick
Just one more will be enough for a fan club.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_club
---
Subject change and dodge?
Why not just answer the question: "Who's the one trick pony now?"?
I design all sorts of electronics, and electronic design involves
thermal issues, electromagnetics, optics, physics, lasers, packaging,
machining, jet engines, IC fab, programming, manufacturing, financial
issues, all sorts of stuff. It changes constantly and it's fun.
Your hero and his faithful co-sidekick Tonto seem to have a single
obsession, really just one simple trick, and use it like a bar bet,
prowling newsgroups off-topic looking for people to challenge and
insult. Seems a huge waste of time for such awesomely wonderful and
talented people with all those awards.
---
It's the awards thing that really galls you, isn't it?
You want _all_ of the attention, and when someone else manages to get
their fair share you just can't stand it and you'll do whatever you
can to make it seem like they're not worthy.
Why can't you just be happy with what you have and wish everyone else
well with whatever they're trying to do?
---
JF
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 64, 65, 66 Next
