elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics - Op amps problem Gain Calculation
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 46, 47, 48
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:58 pm
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
Lots of men, straight/gay/asexual/whatever, don't.
John
John Fields
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:10 pm
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:58:52 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
---
Unlike you, whose tail seems to wag involuntarily and uncontrollably
when you're in the presence of women, some I do and some I don't.
JF
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:26 pm
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:12 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:58:52 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
---
Unlike you, whose tail seems to wag involuntarily and uncontrollably
when you're in the presence of women, some I do and some I don't.
JF
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
---
Unlike you, whose tail seems to wag involuntarily and uncontrollably
when you're in the presence of women, some I do and some I don't.
JF
Sure sounds like you only associate "liking" women with sex. Question
answered, but it actually was answered before.
John
John Fields
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:51 pm
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:26:32 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:58:52 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
---
Unlike you, whose tail seems to wag involuntarily and uncontrollably
when you're in the presence of women, some I do and some I don't.
JF
Sure sounds like you only associate "liking" women with sex.
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:58:52 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.
But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.
Wow, that's about as delicate a phrasing possible to avoid the actual
question, namely do you _like_ women?
---
Unlike you, whose tail seems to wag involuntarily and uncontrollably
when you're in the presence of women, some I do and some I don't.
JF
Sure sounds like you only associate "liking" women with sex.
---
To you perhaps, but you distort what you hear in order to make it sound
the way you want it to.
---
Question answered, but it actually was answered before.
---
Then why did you say it wasn't?
JF
Julio Rodriguez
Guest
Guest
Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:21 am
forget about the RC oscillator, build a simple series RC circuit and
conect the input to a function generator producing 1hz output.
Find a proper value of R so the capacitor will just have enough time to
charge with the incomming square wave.
monitor the charging of the capacitor using an oscilloscope, you can use the
exponential equation for the charging of a capacitor in a series RC circuit
and solve it for C.
For more precise results, you can monitor the capacitor charging process
with a digital oscilloscope and hook up a computer to it using GPIB
(IEEE-488, HPIB)
Write a program to do a "data dump" from the oscilloscope to the computer
carefully look at your data and determine where 1 time constant is.
In an exponential curve, voltage changes quickly at the begining of the
charge curve and then things slow down.
TAKE your measurement at the begining (t,v) if you wait until the cap is
almost fully charged, a very small error in Vc can result in the wrong value
of t (curve is almost horizontal)
Option 2 don't use function generator, use a constant current source
instead!!
IF you charge a capacitor with a constant current source, the result is a
linear ramp, and the capacitance can be obtained from simple arithmetic!!!
V = (1/C) * I * t
"gmv" <noemail_at_please.123> wrote in message
news:JQwMd.18007$C24.14251_at_attbi_s52...
Quote:
Is there anyway to accurately measure the
capacitance of an electrolytic capacitor
in the range of 10uf to 100uf.
These capacitors are to be used at frequencies
under 1 Hz.
Everytime I try to use my meter to measure, the
capacitance will change from one range scale
to the next, I guess because the frequency changes too.
When I use a typical non-electrolytic capacitor
these changes in readings are not there.
I have been thinking of making
a simple RC inverter oscillator and using
the resulting frequency to determine the
true capacitance in the small signal
application I want to apply them to.
Maybe there are non-electrolytic capacitors
in the 10uf to 100uf range but if so
I have never heard of them before.
I do not know if any of you have ever seen
the SCI FI movie THIS ISLAND EARTH
but I am in need of several of those
fantastic capacitors.
I am trying to get a reading
within 1% of reality.
Help here is appreciated.
--
Regards;
gmv
capacitance of an electrolytic capacitor
in the range of 10uf to 100uf.
These capacitors are to be used at frequencies
under 1 Hz.
Everytime I try to use my meter to measure, the
capacitance will change from one range scale
to the next, I guess because the frequency changes too.
When I use a typical non-electrolytic capacitor
these changes in readings are not there.
I have been thinking of making
a simple RC inverter oscillator and using
the resulting frequency to determine the
true capacitance in the small signal
application I want to apply them to.
Maybe there are non-electrolytic capacitors
in the 10uf to 100uf range but if so
I have never heard of them before.
I do not know if any of you have ever seen
the SCI FI movie THIS ISLAND EARTH
but I am in need of several of those
fantastic capacitors.
I am trying to get a reading
within 1% of reality.
Help here is appreciated.
--
Regards;
gmv
Harry
Guest
Guest
Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:29 pm
Wireless
Winston
Guest
Guest
Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:47 pm
Peter Hucker wrote:
Quote:
I've had zero success in finding a MASSIVE digital clock. I'm after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not LCD. Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge digits I can buy? Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of LEDs? Any ideas?
I made a PCB containing 3 digits (and a '1' digit plus a slash
character) all from strings of red LEDs. It also had a LED
clock chip. This was about 16 years ago so I am sure the LED
clock chip is no longer available. Your local thrift store
probably sells N+1 LED clocks good for the critical parts.
--Winston
Guest
Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:47 am
Winston wrote:
Quote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
I've had zero success in finding a MASSIVE digital clock. I'm after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not LCD. Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge digits I can buy? Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of LEDs? Any ideas?
I built a clock with six digits (hh:mm:ss) Each digit is 3 inches tall.
I found those by going to google and instead of doing a regular search,
do a search in the pictures catagory for "huge clocks" or "large
clocks". You will come up with a lot of pictures. Each picture will
take you to where you need to go.
There is one guy who built digits that go from the floor to the ceiling
of his house! Good luck!
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 101003-0, 10/03/2010
Tested on: 10/7/2010 8:47:57 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com
Bob Monsen
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:58 am
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/tutorial_info.php?tutorials_id=47&page=1
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:52:19 -0700, John E. <incognito_at_xbjcd.com> wrote:
Quote:
hi, didntr silicon chip magazine do one ??
mark k
This clock uses 58 mm digits:
http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_101797/article.html
This scoreboard uses 130 mm digits made from individual 10 mm LEDs:
http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_103978/article.html
To read the entirity of either of these articles you have to be a SCM
subscriber or pay.
mark k
This clock uses 58 mm digits:
http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_101797/article.html
This scoreboard uses 130 mm digits made from individual 10 mm LEDs:
http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_103978/article.html
To read the entirity of either of these articles you have to be a SCM
subscriber or pay.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Paul Keinanen
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:17 am
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:37:43 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none_at_spam.com>
wrote:
Quote:
I've had zero success in finding a MASSIVE digital clock.
I'm after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not LCD.
Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge digits I can buy?
Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of LEDs? Any ideas?
I'm after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not LCD.
Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge digits I can buy?
Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of LEDs? Any ideas?
When I saw the subject of this message, I assumed something larger
than 7 segment displays made up of 150 cm fluorescent tubes
.
As others have suggested, a LED strip would be the simplest solution
for your miniature clock.
An other alternative would be a projection clock, with only 20 cm
digits, the illumination level is quite sufficient. If you use back
projection, please remember to switch the horizontal writing
direction.
Warren
Guest
Guest
Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:28 pm
expounded in news:4CAE946D.2E28_at_the-zoo.com:
Quote:
Winston wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
I've had zero success in finding a MASSIVE digital clock. I'm
after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not
LCD. Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge
digits I can buy? Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of
LEDs? Any ideas?
I built a clock with six digits (hh:mm:ss) Each digit is 3 inches
tall. I found those by going to google and instead of doing a regular
search, do a search in the pictures catagory for "huge clocks" or
"large clocks". You will come up with a lot of pictures. Each
picture will take you to where you need to go.
There is one guy who built digits that go from the floor to the
ceiling of his house! Good luck!
Peter Hucker wrote:
I've had zero success in finding a MASSIVE digital clock. I'm
after something with digits about 8 inches tall, preferably LED not
LCD. Perhaps there is a clock circuit I can buy or build and huge
digits I can buy? Or maybe make the digits myself out of loads of
LEDs? Any ideas?
I built a clock with six digits (hh:mm:ss) Each digit is 3 inches
tall. I found those by going to google and instead of doing a regular
search, do a search in the pictures catagory for "huge clocks" or
"large clocks". You will come up with a lot of pictures. Each
picture will take you to where you need to go.
There is one guy who built digits that go from the floor to the
ceiling of his house! Good luck!
My clock radio projects them through a lens onto the
ceiling. This helps a lot since I can't read without
my glasses.
But what would be better, is one using a laser
deflection system rather than the bright LEDs
through a lense.
Warren
Guest
Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:58 am
a huge clockwork dick,,, I have seen one on utube
John Tserkezis
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:38 am
IfIruledtheworld_at_evrydaywouldbethefirstdayofspring.com wrote:
Quote:
a huge clockwork dick,,, I have seen one on utube
You mean like this:
<http://www.sparkfun.com/tutorials/47>
It's certainly a DIY job, and only the display construction would be
of use to you, but you get the idea.
--
No wanna work... wanna bang on keyboard!
Don Stockbauer
Guest
Guest
Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:16 pm
On Dec 16, 12:43 am, "FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
<FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayerdeletet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
I will pay $75,000 for ASSASSINATING Michigan Congressman Justin Amash
and any US Congressman, any US Senator and FBI, CIA and NSA
DIRECTORS and their FAMILY MEMBERS regardless of their age.
BOMB AMERICAN FEDERAL BUILDINGS, INFRASTRUCTURE and KILL FBI, CIA, DNI and
NSA DIRECTORS
I CHALLENGE all readers to email my THREAT to FBI, CIA, NSA and
Secret Service and get me arrested.......FBI TRANSVESTITES will NOT
arrest me because of this reason.
This is my profile at FBI, CIA and NSA
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy/msg/6212b297461a5bc0?hl=en
You MORONS.........just listen to me.......Everything mentioned in the
following document is REAL and FBI, CIA and NSA had this technology for more
than 20 years........
TORTURE BIBLE of FBI, CIA and NSA
Covert Operations of NSA- Mind Control and Directed Energy Weaponshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25664429/Conspiracy-Mind-Control-Covert-Ope...
1) Bomb these American Federal Buildings and American INFRASTRUCTURE
BUILDINGS and KILL as many FBI, CIA, DNI and NSA PSYCHOPATHS
as possible.
FBI Headquarters - Edgar Hoover Building in Washington DC
CIA Headquarers in Langley, Virginia
NSA Headquarters in Ft George Meade, Maryland
DNI Headquarters in Washington DC
US Congress Building
GoldenGate Bridge SanFrancisco
Empire State Building, Newyork
Brooklyn Bridge, Newyork
Hoover Dam, Nevada
Willis Tower, Chicago
Washington Monument, Washington DC
Lockheed Martin Corporate Headquarters
Northrop Grumman Headquarters
Ratheyon
Xe Company Headquarters
Booz Allen Hamilton
Alliant Techsystems
The Heritage Foundation
Manhattan Institute
Rand Corporation
American Enterprise Institute
American Embassies in every country
2) Kill the MASS MURDERERS and WHITE CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS George Bush Jr,
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and FBI Director Robert Mueller III, CIA
Director David Patraeus, NSA Director Keith Alexander, DNI director Dennis
Blair.........
I will pay $75,000 REWARD to the American HERO who SUCCESSFULLY KILLS any
one of these PSYCHOPATHIC TERRORISTS and also to any American HERO who BOMBS
the FEDERAL BUILDINGS and other American INFRASTRUCTURE buildings I
mentioned.
TO ALL THE CAUCASIANS READNG THIS MESSAGE,
I am NOT a muslim myself and It is NOT the Muslims who will take away your
freedoms, civil liberties that you never had in the first place.
It is the FORKED TONGUED CHRISTIAN PSYCHOPATHS like YOURSELF who SECRETLY
CHIPPED about 1 MILLION AMERICANS with SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY chips already
and torturing them for more than twenty years that are taking away your
"very limited" freedoms and civil liberties.
Muslims neither have the INTELLIGENCE nor the TECHNOLOGY nor the MONEY nor
the CUNNING FORKED TONGUES to even make a DENT in your fucking pathetic
slavish lives.........
This is how the WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN TERRORISTS are RAPING, TORTURING
and KILLING POWERLESS Americans for decades.....
MODUS OPERANDI OF FBI, CIA and NSA PSYCHOPATHS and TERRORISTShttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.mindcontrol/msg/9329d2af1c6e5f8b?h...
If somehow the RELIGION PART is magically removed from MUSLIM TERRORIST
minds, they will be NICE HUMAN BEINGS.....
But RELIGION has NOTHING TO DO with WHITE CHRISTIAN PSYCHOPATHIC BLOOD LUST,
SADISM and PERVERSION.......It is in their GENES, BLOOD and BRAIN...........
Which means WHITE CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS in WESTERN GOVERNMENTS are the MOST
EVIL ANIMALS on the planet......
Your psychopathic governments programmed your brains to think every one who
accuses the government of tortures is "delusional".
MKULTRA and COINTELPRO were never terminated. They merely became SECRET
TORTURES.
Stop watching those stupid fucking reality shows Kardashians, Jon and Kate,
Jersey Shore and the rest of the dumb american shit and use that fucking
time to google and youtube for SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY, MKULTRA,
DEW Weapons and COINTELPRO.........
If you trust the EVIL WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN at CIA, NSA and FBI, you are
digging your own grave.
REAL WORLD HERO
AmerGovtPsychopathsExposer
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer
HusbandOfALLFBInCIAnNSA Agents
and any US Congressman, any US Senator and FBI, CIA and NSA
DIRECTORS and their FAMILY MEMBERS regardless of their age.
BOMB AMERICAN FEDERAL BUILDINGS, INFRASTRUCTURE and KILL FBI, CIA, DNI and
NSA DIRECTORS
I CHALLENGE all readers to email my THREAT to FBI, CIA, NSA and
Secret Service and get me arrested.......FBI TRANSVESTITES will NOT
arrest me because of this reason.
This is my profile at FBI, CIA and NSA
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy/msg/6212b297461a5bc0?hl=en
You MORONS.........just listen to me.......Everything mentioned in the
following document is REAL and FBI, CIA and NSA had this technology for more
than 20 years........
TORTURE BIBLE of FBI, CIA and NSA
Covert Operations of NSA- Mind Control and Directed Energy Weaponshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25664429/Conspiracy-Mind-Control-Covert-Ope...
1) Bomb these American Federal Buildings and American INFRASTRUCTURE
BUILDINGS and KILL as many FBI, CIA, DNI and NSA PSYCHOPATHS
as possible.
FBI Headquarters - Edgar Hoover Building in Washington DC
CIA Headquarers in Langley, Virginia
NSA Headquarters in Ft George Meade, Maryland
DNI Headquarters in Washington DC
US Congress Building
GoldenGate Bridge SanFrancisco
Empire State Building, Newyork
Brooklyn Bridge, Newyork
Hoover Dam, Nevada
Willis Tower, Chicago
Washington Monument, Washington DC
Lockheed Martin Corporate Headquarters
Northrop Grumman Headquarters
Ratheyon
Xe Company Headquarters
Booz Allen Hamilton
Alliant Techsystems
The Heritage Foundation
Manhattan Institute
Rand Corporation
American Enterprise Institute
American Embassies in every country
2) Kill the MASS MURDERERS and WHITE CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS George Bush Jr,
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and FBI Director Robert Mueller III, CIA
Director David Patraeus, NSA Director Keith Alexander, DNI director Dennis
Blair.........
I will pay $75,000 REWARD to the American HERO who SUCCESSFULLY KILLS any
one of these PSYCHOPATHIC TERRORISTS and also to any American HERO who BOMBS
the FEDERAL BUILDINGS and other American INFRASTRUCTURE buildings I
mentioned.
TO ALL THE CAUCASIANS READNG THIS MESSAGE,
I am NOT a muslim myself and It is NOT the Muslims who will take away your
freedoms, civil liberties that you never had in the first place.
It is the FORKED TONGUED CHRISTIAN PSYCHOPATHS like YOURSELF who SECRETLY
CHIPPED about 1 MILLION AMERICANS with SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY chips already
and torturing them for more than twenty years that are taking away your
"very limited" freedoms and civil liberties.
Muslims neither have the INTELLIGENCE nor the TECHNOLOGY nor the MONEY nor
the CUNNING FORKED TONGUES to even make a DENT in your fucking pathetic
slavish lives.........
This is how the WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN TERRORISTS are RAPING, TORTURING
and KILLING POWERLESS Americans for decades.....
MODUS OPERANDI OF FBI, CIA and NSA PSYCHOPATHS and TERRORISTShttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.mindcontrol/msg/9329d2af1c6e5f8b?h...
If somehow the RELIGION PART is magically removed from MUSLIM TERRORIST
minds, they will be NICE HUMAN BEINGS.....
But RELIGION has NOTHING TO DO with WHITE CHRISTIAN PSYCHOPATHIC BLOOD LUST,
SADISM and PERVERSION.......It is in their GENES, BLOOD and BRAIN...........
Which means WHITE CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS in WESTERN GOVERNMENTS are the MOST
EVIL ANIMALS on the planet......
Your psychopathic governments programmed your brains to think every one who
accuses the government of tortures is "delusional".
MKULTRA and COINTELPRO were never terminated. They merely became SECRET
TORTURES.
Stop watching those stupid fucking reality shows Kardashians, Jon and Kate,
Jersey Shore and the rest of the dumb american shit and use that fucking
time to google and youtube for SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY, MKULTRA,
DEW Weapons and COINTELPRO.........
If you trust the EVIL WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN at CIA, NSA and FBI, you are
digging your own grave.
REAL WORLD HERO
AmerGovtPsychopathsExposer
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer
HusbandOfALLFBInCIAnNSA Agents
Lordy mercy, this just shows how 100% meaningless these usenet posts
are.
elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics - Op amps problem Gain Calculation
