Op amps problem Gain Calculation

Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:27 am   

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise_at_example.net>
wrote:


5'7.5". Maybe hard to estimate from your extreme elevation.

I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about

Your file cabinet has a warranty?


Kids and dogs and women seem to like me. I work at appearing
innocuous, to make a neutral first impression until I size up a
situation. That seems to work in most business situations.

John

Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:20 am   

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:




---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?

Probably not, since the "knowledge" you say you share is, more often
than not, banal and "Hey, look at me! Ain't I great???"
---


---
Well, if we _are_ like hens it's because we usually post our helpful
"eggs" without fanfare, while you strut around mostly crowing but doing
little else.

Your point here, with that "but" is that since you've assigned yourself
the role of banty rooster you get to rule the roost and write the rules
because the "hens" are inferior.

And why? Because they're female, of course.

JF

Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:49 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:


Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.

I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.

You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.

John

Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:15 pm   

Beats me.

When you learn how to use paragraphs and sentences I might read your obsessive stuff but at the moment it's just the usual loonie rant.

Rheilly P
"Robert Bates" <r.c.bates_at_btinternet.com> wrote in message news:dZ-dnaDfhoX4Ug7XnZ2dnUVZ8s4AAAAA_at_bt.com...
CHILD ABUSE OF A FOUR YEAR OLD To begin with I am tired of holding this secret so those that are guilty will benefit from my silence. This is not an attempt at harrassment or slander of any person. The Australian police have already attempted to silence me, GO TO HELL !!! This is a factual account experienced by me of allegations made by my son James Bates against Mr Ronald Armstrong, father of Tanya Armstrong ( now Bates). Paul Armstrong, Simon Armstrong. He was to my knowledge married to Louise Armstrong. They were residents of the state of Victoria, Australia. More specifically the Mornington Penninsula, Rosebud. While a minor my son James Bates accused Ronald Armstrong of sexually assaulting him at the age of four. He was penetrated anally. As his legal guardian and the parent who had contact with the police to give consent for the investigation to go ahead, I have first hand knowledge of these allegations. James is now eighteen years old and can still remember what happened to him vividly. My ex wife Tanya Bates told me that she had been sexually abused by her father from the age of nine to nineteen. In full knowledge of what her father did to her she allowed my children James Bates, Samantha Bates, Nickolas Bates to spend time around this man. I have first hand knowledge of this as I am an eye witness to these events. As conveyed to me by the police child protection team in Lowestoft, after the investigation Mr Ronald Armstrong was sent to prison for the abuse of my ex wife but he denied the abuse of my son. I as the father of Samantha and Nickolas Bates have repeatedly been denied access to my children in Australia because my ex wife knows very well I will tell the children the truth. Late last year , 2009, I attempted to contact my children in Australia only to be told in the first phone call by my ex wife that my daughter Samantha had been abused by her ex partner Darren who was an alcoholic. I attempted to get the information out of my daughter via MSN messenger but she would not say as she had discussed things with her mother and for brodies sake, the son of the alcoholic, that they should keep things quiet. After finding this out I wrote some abusive emails to her and have been telling her friends about the abuse of my eldest son. Through interpol the Australian Police have attempted to have me charged with harrassment. I signed an unofficial warning in the Suffolk policemans notebook. The police in the UK know very well what is going on and I was treated very leniently. Hearing that your second eldest child has been abused as well would make any parent go insane. To be honest I hope that abuse victims throughout the world read this. Yes, my ex wife was abused by her father but it does not give her the moral right to abuse my children. Her father was abused as well and he is in prison. Why wasn't my ex wife charged with child neglect for knowingly allowing my children to be around a known peadophile ?

Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:14 pm   

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Boy, you don't remember stuff too good, do you? I took a picture of
them stuck to my file cabinet, posted it on a.b.s.e, and you said that
I'd voided the warranty. I asked, "What, by not cutting them in two?"
because you had mentioned being able to separate the saying from the
logo and address & stuff. You said, with much indignation, "They're
_REFRIGERATOR_ magnets!" (I don't remember the exact level of emphasis,
but it _was_ emphasized! )

I can't quote chapter and verse, because google doesn't archive alt.,
which I don't get any more anyway. )-;

;-)
Rich

Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:26 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


---
Now Bill...

So you _can't_ see it. Figures...
---


---
More of the "Larkin shuffle", huh?

Somewhat entertaining in an annoying sort of way...
---


---
Show me where it says I have to answer any of your questions, OK?
---


---
If I did, I would, and I certainly wouldn't need permission from you.

Well, I've had about enough of this fol-de-rol; I made my point and you
proved it, so I'll take my leave.

JF

Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:58 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:14:20 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise_at_example.net>
wrote:


A brain is like a file cabinet: it can only hold so much, so file the
important stuff and recycle the rest.

John

Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:32 am   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:53 -0500, John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote:



But you just did.

John

Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:03 am   

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:12:13 -0500, "Martin H. Eastburn"
<lionslair_at_consolidated.net> wrote:


I brought an error very like that around here a while back. I had to
eat it. Search for it.

Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:48 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:32:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


---
Geez, no wonder you're having trouble finding a divide-by circuit.

I commented on your _statement_ by asking a question.

JF

Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:14 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:58:46 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

My brain would beg to differ here. I remember _everything_, unless
I'm in a blackout drunk state, which I don't do very much any more.

And I'd claim that there's no theoretical limit, since "memories" and
stuff aren't held in some finite file cabinet-thing, but are stored in
patterns of synapses; you don't grow any new neurons, but there's no
known limit to the number of synapses you can grow - oh, yeah - we make
new synapses everything something makes an impact on us - I think the
expression of emotion releases hormones or enzymes or something that
stimulate synapse growth.

Ever notice that you remember stuff that was a big deal at the time, but
not mundane stuff, like what you had for lunch last week? :-)

You remember your downhill run - do you remember the T-bar ride just
before it? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:55 pm   

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:14:32 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise_at_example.net>
wrote:


I read about some people who remember everything. It's more a curse
than a blessing. One guy says that the slightest input - a name, a
sound, a number - unleashes a flood of memories that can be
overwhelming.

There are lots of things better off forgotten.

John

Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:19 pm   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:14:20 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise_at_example.net>
wrote:


You might try Internet replayer, it archives some of a.b.s.e.

Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:32 am   

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:55:29 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


---
Unless you have memories of actions which you'd like to forget, why
would you say that?
---


---
And that's bad?

Why?
---


---
Like history, so you can make the same old mistakes over and over and
over again?

Why is that better?

Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:03 am   

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


Oops, you're right about my answering your question; mea culpa.

But, From my earlier posts I thought it should have been obvious that my
choice of sexual partners would exclude men.

YMMV.
JF