EDAboard.com | EDAboard.de | EDAboard.co.uk | WTWH Media

Montana is damaged

Ask a question - edaboard.com

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - Montana is damaged

Goto page Previous  1, 2

George Herold
Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:45 am   



On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 6:11:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:28:43 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whit3rd_at_gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:15:44 AM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:

WP is entirely predictable. They don't allow objectivity to interfere
with their mission.

They report bark beetle damage in Montana forest, years after everyone saw
the same thing across the border in Canada. Yep, climate change
does that, when the winter kill of parasites is no longer happening.

The current heat wave must make those insects very happy.

https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/polar-vortex-by-the-numbers-6-states-in-us-record-temperatures-lower-than-south-pole/70007296

Yeah a hard freeze is good for keeping down the vermin (I think mostly
of ticks) I'm not sure this one is going to last long enough to count as
'hard'. It's -5 (F) here now and predicted to be in the upper 40's
this weekend!

George H.
Quote:



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com


Tom Gardner
Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 2:45 am   



On 30/01/19 20:10, John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:25:18 -0800 (PST), speff <spehro_at_gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:36:59 UTC-5, Bob Engelhardt wrote:
On 1/29/2019 11:55 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation

Pay to read

Right-click, open in incognito window (Chrome). Enjoy.

--Spehro Pefhany

Often Firefox "private browsing window" will access paywalled stuff.

For some reason, left-wing stuff is often paywalled but conservative
sites aren't.


Conservative sites are paid for by other hidden means.

You are the product that are being sold to such
conservative sites.


Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 2:45 am   



On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 7:10:20 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:25:18 -0800 (PST), speff <spehro_at_gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:36:59 UTC-5, Bob Engelhardt wrote:
On 1/29/2019 11:55 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation

Pay to read

Right-click, open in incognito window (Chrome). Enjoy.

--Spehro Pefhany

Often Firefox "private browsing window" will access paywalled stuff.

For some reason, left-wing stuff is often paywalled but conservative
sites aren't.


John Larkin can get his right wing propaganda for free, but rational analysis of why the right-wing propaganda is misleading and deceptive takes time and costs money.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney


Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 2:45 am   



On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 3:15:44 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:37:05 -0800 (PST), jurb6006_at_gmail.com wrote:

Maybe you can find it at a news source. The Washington Post is NOT. they aren't even a good leftist newsletter/rag hard as they may try.

WP is entirely predictable. They don't allow objectivity to interfere
with their mission.


John Larkin has a rather simple-minded assessment algorithm, and his "entirely predictable" concentrates on the number of times Donald Trump is criticised, and makes no predictions about the nature of faults that are being criticised.

He wants his president to get the same kind of flattery as he feels is his due, and isn't much interested in what he might be flattered for - congratulations on persistent mendacity might be acceptable.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney


Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 6:45 am   



On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 12:18:10 PM UTC+11, Tom Gardner wrote:
Quote:
On 30/01/19 20:10, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:25:18 -0800 (PST), speff <spehro_at_gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:36:59 UTC-5, Bob Engelhardt wrote:
On 1/29/2019 11:55 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation

Pay to read

Right-click, open in incognito window (Chrome). Enjoy.

--Spehro Pefhany

Often Firefox "private browsing window" will access paywalled stuff.

For some reason, left-wing stuff is often paywalled but conservative
sites aren't.

Conservative sites are paid for by other hidden means.

You are the product that are being sold to such
conservative sites.


He is a gullible twit, who retails the nonsense he's been fed by his conservation propaganda sites, so he's probably on the more valuable end of the product range on offer, even if the product quality leaves a lot to be desired.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Jeff Liebermann
Guest

Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:45 am   



On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:36:19 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
<BobEngelhardt_at_comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:
On 1/29/2019 11:55 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/gone-in-a-generation

Pay to read


Looks like you're using Firefox.
- Click on the circle with the "i" inside to the left of the
Washington Post URL.
- Click on the right arrow in the box that says "Washington Post"
- Click on "more information" at the bottom of the box.
- Click the "view cookies" button.
- Click "Remove All".
You should be able to view page. Sometimes the we cache fouls things
up. If that happens, close Firefox, wait about 1 minute for the
background processes to close, restart Firefox, and the page should
work.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl_at_cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558


Guest

Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:45 am   



On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:29:24 AM UTC+11, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
"*John Larkin has a rather simple-minded assessment algorithm*"

Yeah maybe, bit the difference between you and him is that he knows when to shut the fuck up. You don't.

Did it ever occur to you that nobody wants your dipshit opinions ?


When I last looked at the group statistics, John Larkin posted more than I did, but then again so did Jim Thompson.

It doesn't seem to occur to John Larkin that nobody wants to read his opinions - many of which seem to be culled from denialist web-sites.

He certainly doesn't know when to shut the fuck up, any more than you do.

I don't really care whether anybody wants my opinion - they are going to get it whether they like it out not. That's what un-moderated groups are about.

You are the last person who should be complaining about it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Goto page Previous  1, 2

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - Montana is damaged

Ask a question - edaboard.com

Arabic version Bulgarian version Catalan version Czech version Danish version German version Greek version English version Spanish version Finnish version French version Hindi version Croatian version Indonesian version Italian version Hebrew version Japanese version Korean version Lithuanian version Latvian version Dutch version Norwegian version Polish version Portuguese version Romanian version Russian version Slovak version Slovenian version Serbian version Swedish version Tagalog version Ukrainian version Vietnamese version Chinese version Turkish version
EDAboard.com map