help identifying transistor

Hello I have a transistor in a TO220AB package that I cannot cross. The
transistor has the following identifiers:

3CD237
MOROCCO < Is a country.
P60NF0 <<<<<< is a partial part number.
6L

I believe it is a mosfet but am not positive.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated

Hello I have a transistor in a TO220AB package that I cannot cross. The
transistor has the following identifiers:

3CD237
MOROCCO
P60NF0
6L

I believe it is a mosfet but am not positive.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated

Gary Woodruff wrote:

Hello I have a transistor in a TO220AB package that I cannot cross.
The transistor has the following identifiers:

3CD237
MOROCCO < Is a country.
P60NF0 <<<<<< is a partial part number.
6L

I believe it is a mosfet but am not positive.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated


www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/7559.pdf

It took three seconds to find with Google.

If you are looking for repair parts you should ask on
news:sci.electronics.repair

Michael A. Terrell Inscribed thus:


Gary Woodruff wrote:

Hello I have a transistor in a TO220AB package that I cannot cross.
The transistor has the following identifiers:

3CD237
MOROCCO < Is a country.
P60NF0 <<<<<< is a partial part number.
6L

I believe it is a mosfet but am not positive.

Any and all help is greatly appreciated


www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/7559.pdf

It took three seconds to find with Google.

If you are looking for repair parts you should ask on
news:sci.electronics.repair


Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not.

Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not. :-(


Sad, isn't it?

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in news:Q_qdndBt6-
MI3oTRnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:

Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not. :-(


Sad, isn't it?



I can't help thinking that Google's SNR is in terminal decline anyway
though..

Lostgallifreyan wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in news:Q_qdndBt6-
MI3oTRnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:

Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not. :-(


Sad, isn't it?



I can't help thinking that Google's SNR is in terminal decline anyway
though..


They will have a fresh influx of idiots in three days, when Cox cable
drops their NNTP service. :(

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in news:-
9WdnTJhmOEAhofRnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:


Lostgallifreyan wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in news:Q_qdndBt6-
MI3oTRnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:

Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not. :-(


Sad, isn't it?



I can't help thinking that Google's SNR is in terminal decline anyway
though..


They will have a fresh influx of idiots in three days, when Cox cable
drops their NNTP service. :(



Can't wait. > Mind you, I was thinking of Google's search SNR but it cuts
both ways. Talking of cutting both ways, if people who know how to use usenet
are displaced to GG, that might actually help.

A lot of the best SNR seems to be had when people who've been in the industry
a long time have collected data that the originators later abandon. I don't
know how that will go in future, but some might end up in paid-access-only
sites on the web, so it's good when people here point out links to it when it
appears for free. Some things are getting very hard to find unless we already
know where to look. A growing web won't make that any better. I just try to
keep a clear idea of what I'm looking for.

Lostgallifreyan wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in news:-
9WdnTJhmOEAhofRnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:


Lostgallifreyan wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in
news:Q_qdndBt6- MI3oTRnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com:

Don't these GG's know how to Google...
It seems not. :-(


Sad, isn't it?



I can't help thinking that Google's SNR is in terminal decline
anyway though..


They will have a fresh influx of idiots in three days, when Cox
cable
drops their NNTP service. :(



Can't wait. > Mind you, I was thinking of Google's search SNR but it
cuts both ways. Talking of cutting both ways, if people who know how to
use usenet are displaced to GG, that might actually help.

A lot of the best SNR seems to be had when people who've been in the
industry a long time have collected data that the originators later
abandon. I don't know how that will go in future, but some might end up
in paid-access-only sites on the web, so it's good when people here
point out links to it when it appears for free. Some things are getting
very hard to find unless we already know where to look. A growing web
won't make that any better. I just try to keep a clear idea of what I'm
looking for.


I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:55:30 -0400 "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
_fCdnZSVzKiPT4fRnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>:

I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

Here's one worth having if you don't already own it. It's a Fairchild
Semiconductor 1987 Linear databook:
http://www.4shared.com/get/318442879/eebb81aa/FS_1987_LinearDatabook.html
;jsessionid=7A5EEE83DD0378FFF82DA851B30C6F15.dc214

1,120 pages!

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:55:30 -0400 "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
_fCdnZSVzKiPT4fRnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>:

I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

Here's one worth having if you don't already own it. It's a Fairchild
Semiconductor 1987 Linear databook:
http://www.4shared.com/get/318442879/eebb81aa/FS_1987_LinearDatabook.html;jsessionid=7A5EEE83DD0378FFF82DA851B30C6F15.dc214

1,120 pages!

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

I don't.. Maybe I ought to but I usually do it like someone on a beach
collecting the ones that look shiny. Basically if it looks like I might
use the part. If I do use it I keep all I can get, multiple sourced sheets
for LM317, LF412, etc.. I like to stay with the smallest range of parts I can
get away with, on the principle that the more parts there are, the more are
going to be doomed to obsolescence anyway. And Google rarely lets me down
entirely at need. If any sheet seemed hard to find I usually keep a copy just
because of that, too.

Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

I save every datasheet and equipment manual I see a link posted for.

I don't.. Maybe I ought to but I usually do it like someone on a beach
collecting the ones that look shiny. Basically if it looks like I might
use the part. If I do use it I keep all I can get, multiple sourced sheets
for LM317, LF412, etc.. I like to stay with the smallest range of parts I can
get away with, on the principle that the more parts there are, the more are
going to be doomed to obsolescence anyway. And Google rarely lets me down
entirely at need. If any sheet seemed hard to find I usually keep a copy just
because of that, too.


I've looked for a datasheet for the NEC MC-5800 hybrid IF/RF
amplifier for years, but can't find it anywhere. I still have a full
carton of them.