EDAboard.com | EDAboard.eu | EDAboard.de | EDAboard.co.uk | RTV forum PL | NewsGroups PL

FPGA development

Ask a question - edaboard.com

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - FPGA - FPGA development

Goto page Previous  1, 2

rickman
Guest

Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:02 pm   



On Oct 28, 5:20 am, Brian Drummond <br...@shapes.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:38:35 +0000, Brian Drummond wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:52:45 -0500, Jon Elson wrote:

Nico Coesel wrote:

Note that the WebPack does not support 64-bit OS's.  I think this is
due to US export regulations.  (At least this was true last time I
checked.)

Not officially...

But if your 64-bit OS has the correct 32-bit compatibility libraries
installed, Webpack will run just fine. You just have to modify the
install script, ...

minor correction; ISE13.1 Webpack installs and runs "out of the box" on a
64-bit system. On OpenSuse 11.3 at least; I haven't tried any others.

- Brian

It's hard to even buy a PC with less than 4 GB of memory which means
it has to have a 64 bit version of a Windows OS. If FPGA vendors
don't want to support 64 bit OS how can they expect customers to work
with their larger devices? I guess they just don't expect them to be
using the free versions of their tools. So they have to maintain two
completely different tool sets? I know the way the simulation vendors
sell tools with different levels of performance is to sell everyone
the same code and to turn on the "cripple" factor on the low end
tools. I would think the FPGA vendors would be providing the same
software to everyone and just using a license to enable the higher end
features of the paid for software. I guess they could turn off 64 bit
support too... but that would be too strange.

Rick

Rob Doyle
Guest

Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:50 pm   



On 10/23/2011 3:38 AM, Brian Drummond wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:52:45 -0500, Jon Elson wrote:

Nico Coesel wrote:



Note that the WebPack does not support 64-bit OS's. I think this is due
to US export regulations. (At least this was true last time I checked.)

Not officially...

But if your 64-bit OS has the correct 32-bit compatibility libraries
installed, Webpack will run just fine. You just have to modify the
install script, where it detects the 64-bit OS and exits, to comment out
the exit... Then it will install and just work without further problems.

Tested with Webpack 10.1 to 13.1 inclusive, on OpenSuse 11.0 to 11.4.
(I adopted OpenSuse because 11.0 offered to install the 32-bit libs and
simply worked, and I haven't looked back). Will probably work with most
other recent Linuxes (you may have to find/install a few libraries).

- Brian

I'm running 64-bit Webpack v 13.1 on Windows 7.

Rob.

glen herrmannsfeldt
Guest

Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:52 pm   



rickman <gnuarm_at_gmail.com> wrote:

(snip, someone wrote)
Quote:
minor correction; ISE13.1 Webpack installs and runs "out of the box" on a
64-bit system. On OpenSuse 11.3 at least; I haven't tried any others.

I have ISE13.2, I believe the 64 bit webpack.

Quote:
It's hard to even buy a PC with less than 4 GB of memory which means
it has to have a 64 bit version of a Windows OS.

Well, the hardware supports 36 bit real addressing even in 32 bit
mode, though a single task can't address more than about 3GB.

Quote:
If FPGA vendors don't want to support 64 bit OS how can they
expect customers to work with their larger devices?

The free versions don't support the larger devices. The line
keeps moving, though, and even small devices P&R faster with
more memory.

Quote:
I guess they just don't expect them to be
using the free versions of their tools. So they have to maintain two
completely different tool sets? I know the way the simulation vendors
sell tools with different levels of performance is to sell everyone
the same code and to turn on the "cripple" factor on the low end
tools. I would think the FPGA vendors would be providing the same
software to everyone and just using a license to enable the higher end
features of the paid for software. I guess they could turn off 64 bit
support too... but that would be too strange.

As far as I know, it is usually a compile time option to generate
the 32bit or 64bit instructions.

-- glen

Goto page Previous  1, 2

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - FPGA - FPGA development

Ask a question - edaboard.com

Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
RTV map EDAboard.com map News map EDAboard.eu map EDAboard.de map EDAboard.co.uk map Opony