Philippe
Guest
Fri May 13, 2011 4:32 pm
Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL? I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...
http://www.sigasi.com/content/navigating-through-vhdl-project-emacs-vs-sigasi
have a nice weekend!
--
Philippe
Sigasi
Paul Uiterlinden
Guest
Fri May 13, 2011 4:32 pm
Philippe wrote:
Quote:
Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL?
Yes, I use vtags in combination with Nedit or Vim.
I got vtags from
http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/tools/vtags/, but it seems
not to be accessible from there anymore.
Quote:
I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...
Still, it is simple to use and adequate in a lot of cases. And it's free.
--
Paul Uiterlinden
www.aimvalley.nl
e-mail addres: remove the not.
hhanff
Guest
Sat May 14, 2011 12:35 pm
On 13 Mai, 18:12, Paul Uiterlinden <puit...@notaimvalley.nl> wrote:
Quote:
Philippe wrote:
Is there anybody out there who still uses CTAGS (or rather: etags) for
VHDL?
I just discovered etags a few weeks ago.
Currently I'm working on C code and it really eases the analysis of
foreign code.
Honestly: etags is one of the most important emacs features that I
discovered in the last years I would say.
I'm already looking forward to the next VHDL project where I can give
etags a try...
hhanff
Quote:
Yes, I use vtags in combination with Nedit or Vim.
I got vtags
fromhttp://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vhdl/tools/vtags/, but it seems
not to be accessible from there anymore.
I was surprised to see how crude it really is. No scoping, the
regular expressions get confused easily, problems with name clashes...
Still, it is simple to use and adequate in a lot of cases. And it's free.
--
Paul Uiterlindenwww.aimvalley.nl
e-mail addres: remove the not.
NeedCleverHandle
Guest
Mon May 16, 2011 8:55 pm
On May 13, 7:32 am, Philippe <philippe.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
SPAM? Yup, it's spam.
Have a nice day.
