elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - Driver to drive?
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 3056, 3057, 3058 ... 3228, 3229, 3230 Next
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:33 pm
George Herold <gherold_at_teachspin.com> wrote in news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0fd-
ac2e1631fdb7_at_v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
Quote:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
mpm
Guest
Guest
Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:13 pm
On Aug 25, 3:25 pm, RMCG <r...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
Sorry for the Xpost. There is an ongoing argument about ballasts
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
I can tell you we had a situation a few month ago where a couple of
lights in a parking lot (sodium vapor, I think) were emitting enough
interfernece to cause problems for a cell site receiver setup, atop a
5 or 6 story rooftop, less than 1/4 mile away. So, that would be 850
MHz, ~1,000 feet, and the receivers used at modern cell sites are
"very" sensitive. Active gain and filters, etc... May not be the
same as your situation.
Spehro Pefhany
Guest
Guest
Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:48 pm
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:33:31 -0500, Lostgallifreyan
<no-one_at_nowhere.net> wrote:
Quote:
George Herold <gherold_at_teachspin.com> wrote in news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0fd-
ac2e1631fdb7_at_v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
ac2e1631fdb7_at_v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
A lot less stinky than high pressure selenium.
legg
Guest
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:52 am
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:29:47 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:25:18 -0400, RMCG <rmcg_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry for the Xpost. There is an ongoing argument about ballasts
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279 Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
Get an oscilloscope and wave the probe around the lamp fixtures.
I've seen impressive amounts of 40 KHz crud around flourescent lamp
fixtures.
Why does it matter? Is this one of those EMI-causes-cancer things?
John
Sorry for the Xpost. There is an ongoing argument about ballasts
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279 Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
Get an oscilloscope and wave the probe around the lamp fixtures.
I've seen impressive amounts of 40 KHz crud around flourescent lamp
fixtures.
Why does it matter? Is this one of those EMI-causes-cancer things?
John
The reference thread, in a hydroponic grower's forum, was a banner
suggesting that the EMI was detectable by drug enforcement
organizations.
Ho Hum.
RL
mpm
Guest
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:33 am
On Aug 26, 12:33 pm, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net> wrote:
Quote:
George Herold <gher...@teachspin.com> wrote in news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0fd-
ac2e1631f...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
ac2e1631f...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
As a possibly interesting aside -- when shooting digital photography
at high speed without flash under flourescent light, the white balance
will shift slightly according to where in the 60 cycles the light
source is at, at the exact moment the shutter opens. I don't know if
this is the case with sodium vapor lights? I suspect it would be.
Ditto for mercury vapor lights, although that would occur a much
higher K temp, and perhaps not as noticable of an effect (at least,
not in a photograph).
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:47 am
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:52:32 -0500, legg <legg_at_nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:29:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:25:18 -0400, RMCG <rmcg_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry for the Xpost. There is an ongoing argument about ballasts
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279 Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
Get an oscilloscope and wave the probe around the lamp fixtures.
I've seen impressive amounts of 40 KHz crud around flourescent lamp
fixtures.
Why does it matter? Is this one of those EMI-causes-cancer things?
John
The reference thread, in a hydroponic grower's forum, was a banner
suggesting that the EMI was detectable by drug enforcement
organizations.
Ho Hum.
RL
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:25:18 -0400, RMCG <rmcg_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry for the Xpost. There is an ongoing argument about ballasts
giving off detectable interference.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=3808279#post3808279 Is there
a way to ultimately answer this question? We are going round and
round and need assistance. thx!
Get an oscilloscope and wave the probe around the lamp fixtures.
I've seen impressive amounts of 40 KHz crud around flourescent lamp
fixtures.
Why does it matter? Is this one of those EMI-causes-cancer things?
John
The reference thread, in a hydroponic grower's forum, was a banner
suggesting that the EMI was detectable by drug enforcement
organizations.
Ho Hum.
RL
Cops use thermal imagers, too, to spot buildings that are dissipating
a lot of power. Even if the meters are boogered, I bet the power
feeders get warm, too.
John
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:34 am
Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP_at_interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote in
news:pnkd76decqce4oj46lfbnv44s2pinmj7gs_at_4ax.com:
Quote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:33:31 -0500, Lostgallifreyan
no-one_at_nowhere.net> wrote:
George Herold <gherold_at_teachspin.com> wrote in
news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0fd- ac2e1631fdb7_at_v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
A lot less stinky than high pressure selenium.
no-one_at_nowhere.net> wrote:
George Herold <gherold_at_teachspin.com> wrote in
news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0fd- ac2e1631fdb7_at_v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
A lot less stinky than high pressure selenium.
Hell yes. >
And a far more restrained chemical evolution too.
Sadly I can't pun any better without belabouring the point, it's very very
late here...
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:38 am
mpm <mpmillard_at_aol.com> wrote in news:36ed056e-da27-4b24-9b22-
0fc7f249213a_at_v41g2000yqv.googlegroups.com:
Quote:
On Aug 26, 12:33 pm, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net> wrote:
George Herold <gher...@teachspin.com> wrote in news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0
fd-
ac2e1631f...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
As a possibly interesting aside -- when shooting digital photography
at high speed without flash under flourescent light, the white balance
will shift slightly according to where in the 60 cycles the light
source is at, at the exact moment the shutter opens. I don't know if
this is the case with sodium vapor lights? I suspect it would be.
Ditto for mercury vapor lights, although that would occur a much
higher K temp, and perhaps not as noticable of an effect (at least,
not in a photograph).
George Herold <gher...@teachspin.com> wrote in news:aa3f9942-3365-4c34-b0
fd-
ac2e1631f...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
What's HPS? High Power... Sodium?
George H.
Almost... high pressure sodium.
As a possibly interesting aside -- when shooting digital photography
at high speed without flash under flourescent light, the white balance
will shift slightly according to where in the 60 cycles the light
source is at, at the exact moment the shutter opens. I don't know if
this is the case with sodium vapor lights? I suspect it would be.
Ditto for mercury vapor lights, although that would occur a much
higher K temp, and perhaps not as noticable of an effect (at least,
not in a photograph).
Yep, definitely the same. I have a metal halide that I use for various
things, and when photographing stuff I see this as a shift in the colour and
brightness of the small LCD display. Usually that gives me enough cues to
when to push the button. I still take a couple of pics to be sure though.
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:17 pm
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_shephard_at_cox.net>
wrote:
Quote:
On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
John
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:41 pm
John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:57 pm
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:12 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
Fetching coffee and sandwiches.
John
Nunya
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:59 pm
On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
My boot screens have more on the ball than you do.
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
Guest
Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:53 pm
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:57:25 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:12 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
Fetching coffee and sandwiches.
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
Fetching coffee and sandwiches.
You would eat sandwiches that ScatMan fetched?
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:22 am
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:53:08 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:57:25 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:12 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
Fetching coffee and sandwiches.
You would eat sandwiches that ScatMan fetched?
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:12 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya ?jack_shephard_at_cox.net?
wrote:
?On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
??jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
?? On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe ?j...@usenetlove.invalid? wrote:
??
??
??
?? ?John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ?? Nunya ?jack_shephard cox.net? wrote:
?? ??? John Larkin ?jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com? wrote:
??
?? ???? Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
??
?? ???? Or explain constellation modulation.
??
?? ???? Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
?? ???? bandwidth is squeezed down.
??
?? ??? You don't have the link budget for the answer.
??
?? ?? Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
?? ?? aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
??
?? ?? The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
??
?? ?Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
?? ?nym-shifting.
??
?? But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
?? comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
??
?? John
?
?I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
Picking up dropped hardware for the real workers...
Fetching coffee and sandwiches.
You would eat sandwiches that ScatMan fetched?
Oh. Yuk. Good point.
John
Nunya
Guest
Guest
Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:31 am
On Sep 1, 1:17 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_sheph...@cox.net
wrote:
On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
John
wrote:
On Aug 14, 3:56 pm, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On 14 Aug 2010 18:54:36 GMT, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Nunya <jack_shephard cox.net> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Explain to us how the phasing method of SSB generation works.
Or explain constellation modulation.
Or tell us what happens to a wideband FM signal as the channel
bandwidth is squeezed down.
You don't have the link budget for the answer.
Just tell us what you are and quit pretending to be what you
aren't. You don't know jack about communications theory.
The only person you *might* be fooling is yourself.
Even what he pretends to be changes frequently with his
nym-shifting.
But he knows very little about electronics, certainly nothing about
comm theory. I think he's a math-phobic low-end tech with delusions.
John
I work on the most advanced comm gear in the world, Johnny.
For certain values of "worked on." Like crating/uncrating maybe.
John
"Maybe" it is what Johnny would wish were "certain values of worked
on".
Maybe you should experience "certain values of being worked over".
Maybe you can reply to this post and show us yet again just how
stupid
you are.
Were I to uncrate something we use, the crate would be more advanced
than you or any of your horseshit products, johnny.
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 3056, 3057, 3058 ... 3228, 3229, 3230 Next
elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - Driver to drive?
