DDR termination voltage

Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:20 pm   

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:01:58 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me> wrote:


You bet! The .est.


Blame your parents for stupid. I wasn't there.


Now you're telling me what I must do? That stupid streak runs deep.

You think you do. That's the point. Why you asked the question, in the first
place, will never be known to the sane.


No, only a moron asks a question then argues the answer like they know-it-all.
Indeed, you are both.

Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:28 am   

On 2011-10-11, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me> wrote:

On the flipside, those who refuse to explain their conclusions are not
experts.

Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:25 am   

I pointed your attention to the "issue" that my question is about. You
started to attack me because of that. You punish people just because
they ask a question.

Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:40 pm   

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:25:21 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me>
wrote:


---
You're being "punished" because you're acting like an arrogant little
trolling asshole.

Or maybe it's not an act?

--
JF

Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:20 am   

On 12.10.2011 15:40, John Fields wrote:

If you dare to ask you question in this group, you act like a trolling
arrogant assole. Thank you for reminding me this.

Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:52 am   

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:20:32 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me>
wrote:


---
Actually, in this group, the consensus is that there is no such thing
as a stupid question.

Your original post was, I believe, handled in that manner.

However, since you didn't like the answer(s) you got, you've chosen to
be ever more combative with the passage of time, leading one (me,
anyway) to wonder why you're here at all if not just to attract
attention and feed your ego.

Why _are_ you here, anyway?

--
JF

Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 pm   

I do not think that I must be happy or shut up and get away after the
first response. The first response provided at important aspect. But, it
completely disregards the aspect I wanted to be clarified. It is normal
to ask people to take the OP-requested aspect into consideration and,
BTW, explain what I mean by "draw more power to save power" to the first
replier.

I'm asking here because I do not see a special group on memory/source
synchronous topics. If there is something wrong with this way of acting
then why I should try creating another thread (in another place?)?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:52 pm   

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:11:56 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me>
wrote:


---
The short answer is, "You shouldn't."

--
JF

Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:04 pm   

Thank you for confirming my guess once more.

Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:59 pm   

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:04:52 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me> wrote:


You're guess is that you shouldn't post to the Unsenet? Yes, you were
correct.

Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:37 pm   

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:04:52 +0300, valtih1978 <do_at_not.email.me>
wrote:


---
Welcome to my filter.

--
JF

Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:57 pm   

When I first saw this thread, I thought it was something to do with STASI
interrogation techniques.

;-)

--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence
over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
(Richard Feynman)

Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:53 pm   

On 21.10.2011 20:57, Fred Abse wrote:

I imagine what these agents of devil told you about STASI