cruise ships cunt'd for Mr. Sloman

On Jan 28, 3:06 pm, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Jan 28, 7:42 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
Yes Mr. Sloman your apology is accepted, and I have enrolled you
in
our FMOP (Feeble Minded Outreach Program).
Are you, Mr. Sloman, suggesting you're unqualified for FMOP?

As A.W. Sloman, M.Sc., Ph.D., I seriously doubt that I'd be eligible.
The fact that I'm wasting my time arguing with a delusional clown like
you does suggest that senility has set in, but that's a progressive
condition which wouldn't be handled by any rationally conceived
outreach program.

I never graduated from Public School, or H.S. or from anywhere,
so yes, you may be under qualified for FMOP too.

The logic here is less than transparent. You seems to have skipped
establishing any logic connection between your educational non-
attainments and my eligibility for FMOP, which does reinforce the idea
that you are indeed feeble-minded.

I was bestored with one important degree, 'world's greatest
mathematician',
in HS I helped a Nobel prize winner by fusing QT and GR, among several
other problems.
(I declined accord, too busy to be a publicity jockey)

Anybody can claim to have rejected the Fields Medal. The one person
who actually did so - Grigori Perelman - got a lot of publicity which
he didn't in fact want. The name Ken S. Tucker hasn't had as much
attention.
I'm afraid that you are coming across as a delusional fantasist.

Cunt'd from "cruise ships".

On Jan 29, 9:00 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

On Jan 28, 3:06 pm, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:42 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

 > > Yes Mr. Sloman your apology is accepted, and I have enrolled you
in
 > > our FMOP (Feeble Minded Outreach Program).

Are you, Mr. Sloman, suggesting you're unqualified for FMOP?
As A.W. Sloman, M.Sc., Ph.D., I seriously doubt that I'd be eligible.
The fact that I'm wasting my time arguing with a delusional clown like
you does suggest that senility has set in, but that's a progressive
condition which wouldn't be handled by any rationally conceived
outreach program.

How did you do that? drain your parents bank account to
hang a bit of spagetti off your name, as the only thing you
parents did in your life?

I hope the callouses on your mom's knees are healed well.

I was bestored with one important degree, 'world's greatest
mathematician',
in HS I helped a Nobel prize winner by fusing QT and GR, among several
other problems.
(I declined accord, too busy to be a publicity jockey)

Anybody can claim to have rejected the Fields Medal. The one person
who actually did so - Grigori Perelman - got a lot of publicity which
he didn't in fact want. The name Ken S. Tucker hasn't had as much
attention.
I'm afraid that you are coming across as a delusional fantasist.

Don't know what Field metal is, sounds like horse puckies.
Let me check my unopened mail box sometime.

On Jan 29, 9:05 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
Cunt'd from "cruise ships".
On Jan 29, 9:00 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

On Jan 28, 3:06 pm, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:42 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

Yes Mr. Sloman your apology is accepted, and I have enrolled you
in
our FMOP (Feeble Minded Outreach Program).

Are you, Mr. Sloman, suggesting you're unqualified for FMOP?
As A.W. Sloman, M.Sc., Ph.D., I seriously doubt that I'd be eligible.
The fact that I'm wasting my time arguing with a delusional clown like
you does suggest that senility has set in, but that's a progressive
condition which wouldn't be handled by any rationally conceived
outreach program.

How did you do that? drain your parents bank account to
hang a bit of spagetti off your name, as the only thing you
parents did in your life?

Oddly enough, my parents didn't have to support me through graduate
school. At that stage the Australian government provided research
grants to pretty much everybody who was prepared to defer earning a
proper income after they'd got their first degree.

The logic was that the biggest single cost of keeping people in
graduate school was the money they'd otherwise earn if they had a
proper job, and the grant paid about half that - more than enough to
live on.

I was bestored with one important degree, 'world's greatest
mathematician',
in HS I helped a Nobel prize winner by fusing QT and GR, among several
other problems.
(I declined accord, too busy to be a publicity jockey)

Anybody can claim to have rejected the Fields Medal. The one person
who actually did so - Grigori Perelman - got a lot of publicity which
he didn't in fact want. The name Ken S. Tucker hasn't had as much
attention.
I'm afraid that you are coming across as a delusional fantasist.

Don't know what Field metal is, sounds like horse puckies.
Let me check my unopened mail box sometime.

He's a mathematician who has never heard of the Fields Medal ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal

On Jan 29, 2:34 pm, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Jan 29, 9:05 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
Cunt'd from "cruise ships".
On Jan 29, 9:00 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
On Jan 28, 3:06 pm, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:42 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

 > > Yes Mr. Sloman your apology is accepted, and I have enrolled you
in
 > > our FMOP (Feeble Minded Outreach Program).

Are you, Mr. Sloman, suggesting you're unqualified for FMOP?
As A.W. Sloman, M.Sc., Ph.D., I seriously doubt that I'd be eligible..
The fact that I'm wasting my time arguing with a delusional clown like
you does suggest that senility has set in, but that's a progressive
condition which wouldn't be handled by any rationally conceived
outreach program.

How did you do that? drain your parents bank account to
hang a bit of spagetti off your name, as the only thing you
parents did in your life?

Oddly enough, my parents didn't have to support me through graduate
school. At that stage the Australian government provided research
grants to pretty much everybody who was prepared to defer earning a
proper income after they'd got their first degree.

The logic was that the biggest single cost of keeping people in
graduate school was the money they'd otherwise earn if they had a
proper job, and the grant paid about half that - more than enough to
live on.

Sounds weird. I just made friends with local fella's who had an
interest in math and science. A few of them had reputations as
being " World Famous". Mostly - via phone - we agreed to the subject,
prep'd and then did an hour together.
Prof WW Sawyer had me over to his house very often, I think he
mentioned he was studying mathematical genius, so I recommended
some browner nerds to him.
He didn't seem interested.

I was bestored with one important degree, 'world's greatest
mathematician',
in HS I helped a Nobel prize winner by fusing QT and GR, among several
other problems.
(I declined accord, too busy to be a publicity jockey)

Anybody can claim to have rejected the Fields Medal. The one person
who actually did so - Grigori Perelman - got a lot of publicity which
he didn't in fact want. The name Ken S. Tucker hasn't had as much
attention.
I'm afraid that you are coming across as a delusional fantasist.

Don't know what Field metal is, sounds like horse puckies.
Let me check my unopened mail box sometime.

He's a mathematician who has never heard of the Fields Medal ...

Well that makes two of us.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal

I got some scholarships, the best was forming my own
electronics company, the dough came in so fast we had to shovel
it out the back door, but it was earned, honestly.

Something Sloman never had to do.

On Jan 30, 6:50 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
....
Sounds weird. I just made friends with local fella's who had an
interest in math and science. A few of them had reputations as
being " World Famous". Mostly - via phone - we agreed to the subject,
prep'd and then did an hour together.
Prof WW Sawyer had me over to his house very often, I think he
mentioned he was studying mathematical genius, so I recommended
some browner nerds to him.
He didn't seem interested.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Warwick_Sawyer

He was at Wesleyan in Middletown, Connecticut from 1958 to 1965, but
he also wrote a couple of popular books.

You also claim an acquaintance with John Archibald Wheeler, who was at
Princeton for pretty much his whole career.

You moved around a bit?

I got some scholarships, the best was forming my own
electronics company, the dough came in so fast we had to shovel
it out the back door, but it was earned, honestly.

And we are expected to believe you?

Something Sloman never had to do.

I earned an honest living for most of my working life. EMI Central
Research in London and Cambridge Instruments in Cambridge UK show up
on my patents ... How much compulsion I was under is open to
discussion. I was never in debt until I married and we bought a house,
and a mortgage for less than the value of the house is tolerably
honest kind of debt.

On Jan 30, 1:19 am, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Jan 30, 6:50 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
...
Sounds weird. I just made friends with local fella's who had an
interest in math and science. A few of them had reputations as
being " World Famous". Mostly - via phone - we agreed to the subject,
prep'd and then did an hour together.
Prof WW Sawyer had me over to his house very often, I think he
mentioned he was studying mathematical genius, so I recommended
some browner nerds to him.
He didn't seem interested.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Warwick_Sawyer

He was at Wesleyan in Middletown, Connecticut from 1958 to 1965, but
he also wrote a couple of popular books.

Yes, we started chummin' in 68, he liked Curl and some Div, (was
about 15 and was wrapped into partials of vectors). We drifted once
I went tensor,though he clued me into nonorthogonal space time
which has been sub- sequently adopted internationally.
I did some mundane stuff, and produced a brief,

http://physics.trak4.com/modern-spacetime.pdf

When I say "I" it means I'm responsible for certification, in truth
there's a lot of "we" in I, so I often use "we" to make clear I'm
part of a team.

You also claim an acquaintance with John Archibald Wheeler, who was at
Princeton for pretty much his whole career.

Most of my activity is non-confidential, though respectfully private.
IIRC, Mr. Wheeler and I didn't correspond. I got some imagination
reading his notes on "Geometrodynamics".

You moved around a bit?

You must be confusing me with someone else.

I got some scholarships, the best was forming my own
electronics company, the dough came in so fast we had to shovel
it out the back door, but it was earned, honestly.

And we are expected to believe you?

I don't know what you need to believe.
I needed dough, so I used math/science to join up with a crew
installing Color TV's, Towers, Antennnas and did PA systems. A
fella called George owned G&G,still does,

http://ggelectronics.com/

He is very smart, and arranged for me to be a contractor, to boost
profit margins for us.
In electronics you change like a chameleon so I banked the dough for
future study,(shared a lot too), still do (but I don't push it),

http://physics.trak4.com/

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

Something Sloman never had to do.

I earned an honest living for most of my working life. EMI Central
Research in London and Cambridge Instruments in Cambridge UK show up
on my patents ... How much compulsion I was under is open to
discussion. I was never in debt until I married and we bought a house,
and a mortgage for less than the value of the house is tolerably
honest kind of debt.

Yeah, but you were born with an Ag spoon stuck in your mouth.

On Jan 30, 4:17 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote
When I say "I" it means I'm responsible for certification, in truth
there's a lot of "we" in I, so I often use "we" to make clear I'm
part of a team.

Who specialise in obscurity. There was a time when I could follow bra-
ket notation - there's an example of it in my Ph.D. thesis - but I was
never silly enough to assume that any arbitrary reader would.

Most of my activity is non-confidential, though respectfully private.
IIRC, Mr. Wheeler and I didn't correspond. I got some imagination
reading his notes on "Geometrodynamics".

So you weren't actually in contact and he wasn't any kind of mentor?

You moved around a bit?

You must be confusing me with someone else.

I suspect you confuse yourself with some else, who doesn't happen to
have existed but would have had some good stories to tell if he had.

I don't know what you need to believe.
I needed dough, so I used math/science to join up with a crew
installing Color TV's, Towers, Antennnas and did PA systems. A
fella called George owned G&G,still does,

http://ggelectronics.com/

You don't need maths/science to be a TV installer and repairer, and
people with real maths/science can get better-paying jobs.

He is very smart, and arranged for me to be a contractor, to boost
profit margins for us.
In electronics you change like a chameleon so I banked the dough for
future study,(shared a lot too), still do (but I don't push it),

http://physics.trak4.com/

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.
Ken

On Jan 30, 8:22 am,BillSloman<bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
...

On Jan 30, 4:17 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote

IIRC, Mr. Wheeler and I didn't correspond. I got some imagination
reading his notes on "Geometrodynamics".

So you weren't actually in contact and he wasn't any kind of mentor?

Read what I wrote, it means, if there was any correspondence with
Wheeler it's private. Maybe having become a theoretician I may
have had some.

You moved around a bit?

You must be confusing me with someone else.

I suspect you confuse yourself with some else, who doesn't happen to
have existed but would have had some good stories to tell if he had.

I guess so, the next fella I chummmed with was Prof Grueb, (UofT),
he was classy, top mathematician, I flashed succinct equations,
he knew near instantly their meaning, it was nice ultra fast.

I don't know what you need to believe.
I needed dough, so I used math/science to join up with a crew
installing Color TV's, Towers, Antennnas and did PA systems. A
fella called George owned G&G,still does,

http://ggelectronics.com/

You don't need maths/science to be a TV installer and repairer, and
people with real maths/science can get better-paying jobs.

Well I needed the field work, something you rich people don't.

He is very smart, and arranged for me to be a contractor, to boost
profit margins for us.
In electronics you change like a chameleon so I banked the dough for
future study,(shared a lot too), still do (but I don't push it),

http://physics.trak4.com/

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

On Jan 31, 1:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
snippin slomans Feebles

The next fella I chummed with was Prof Grueb, (UofT),
he was classy, top mathematician, I flashed succinct equations,
he knew near instantly their meaning, it was nice ultra fast.

So you now claim to have attended the University of Toronto?

I don't know what you need to believe.
I needed dough, so I used math/science to join up with a crew
installing Color TV's, Towers, Antennnas and did PA systems. A
fella called George owned G&G,still does,

http://ggelectronics.com/

You don't need maths/science to be a TV installer and repairer, and
people with real maths/science can get better-paying jobs.

Well I needed the field work, something you rich people don't.

I wasn't rich as a graduate student, but since I managed to graduate
with first class honours (just) I qualified for a research grant,
which was big enough to keep me fed and housed. I did do some
demonstrating for the Chemistry Department - they didn't pay much, but
the extra money was welcome.

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

You claim to have discovered something that would force a paradigm
shift - like many other amateur physicists - but you have failed to
persuade anybody in the business that it is a valid discovery. You
haven't been able to get it published in any of the peer-reviewed
journals - even the struggling fringe with tiny impact factors (who
will usually publish anything they can get their hands) on figure that
your offering is so far off the wall that publishing it would destroy
whatever tiny shreds of reputation they've managed to build up.

On Jan 31, 4:40 am,BillSloman<bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:> On Jan 31, 1:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

So you now claim to have attended the University of Toronto?

Hardly.

I don't know what you need to believe.
I needed dough, so I used math/science to join up with a crew
installing Color TV's, Towers, Antennnas and did PA systems. A
fella called George owned G&G,still does,

http://ggelectronics.com/

You don't need maths/science to be a TV installer and repairer, and
people with real maths/science can get better-paying jobs.

Well I needed the field work, something you rich people don't.

I wasn't rich as a graduate student, but since I managed to graduate
with first class honours (just) I qualified for a research grant,
which  was big enough to keep me fed and housed. I did do some
demonstrating for the Chemistry Department - they didn't pay much, but
the extra money was welcome.

Too bad you had it so easy, it's the challenge that forms a person.

I was recommended for a professors position when I was 19 or so,
but I deferred and sought industry.

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

You claim to have discovered something that would force a paradigm
shift - like many other amateur physicists - but you have failed to
persuade anybody in the business that it is a valid discovery. You
haven't been able to get it published in any of the peer-reviewed
journals - even the struggling fringe with tiny impact factors (who
will usually publish anything they can get their hands) on figure that
your offering is so far off the wall that publishing it would destroy
whatever tiny shreds of reputation they've managed to build up.

What's required, is a specification dealing with an Advanced LIGO
null (that I find to be probable), in the event that occurs I have
made available some of the tools (most) to conduct a successful
paradigm shift.
That was the extent of the contract.

On Jan 31, 9:14 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

On Jan 31, 4:40 am,BillSloman<bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:> On Jan 31, 1:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

snip

So you now claim to have attended the University of Toronto?

Hardly.

So you hung around with university people, but didn't attend the
university? It seems more likely that you did attend but flunked out
without getting any kind of degree.

Too bad you had it so easy, it's the challenge that forms a person.

I create a few of my own challenges - there's 900 lines of Macro-8 -
PDP-8 assembler code - in my Ph.D. thesis, which is unexpected in a
chemistry thesis, and a few circuit diagrams (ditto).

I was recommended for a professors position when I was 19 or so,
but I deferred and sought industry.

Newton had to wait until he was 27 before he got a similar offer. It's
a pity Newton made the wrong choice - he could well have been the
world's greatest TV repairer and installer (after he'd managed to
invent TV).

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

You claim to have discovered something that would force a paradigm
shift - like many other amateur physicists - but you have failed to
persuade anybody in the business that it is a valid discovery. You
haven't been able to get it published in any of the peer-reviewed
journals - even the struggling fringe with tiny impact factors (who
will usually publish anything they can get their hands) on figure that
your offering is so far off the wall that publishing it would destroy
whatever tiny shreds of reputation they've managed to build up.

What's required, is a specification dealing with an Advanced LIGO
null (that I find to be probable), in the event that occurs I have
made available some of the tools (most) to conduct a successful
paradigm shift.
That was the extent of the contract.

The contract to supply the tools to make a paradigm shift possible
must contain some interesting wording. Paradigm shifts are - by
definition - unpredictable, so a contract to supply the tools to
create such a shift would be amazingly unspecific.

Since very few people seems to have noticed that this particular
paradigm shift has taken place, one might imagine that the paradigm
that has been shifted is entirely located between your ears, as some
kind of virtual paradigm shift appearing spontaneously in an
intellectual vacuum.

On Jan 31, 2:22 pm,BillSloman<bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Jan 31, 9:14 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

On Jan 31, 4:40 am,BillSloman<bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:> On Jan 31, 1:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

snip

So you now claim to have attended the University of Toronto?

Hardly.

So you hung around with university people, but didn't attend the
university? It seems more likely that you did attend but flunked out
without getting any kind of degree.

Sloman, you have an unhealthy obsession with schooling,
is that a European thing?

Anyway I regard myself as a theoretician.
The government claims I'm a Doctor of mathematical physics,

but I think of an MD as a real Dr. cuz they can write prescriptions.

My talent is trouble-shooting including complicated systems.

Too bad you had it so easy, it's the challenge that forms a person.

I create a few of my own challenges - there's 900 lines of Macro-8 -
PDP-8 assembler code - in my Ph.D. thesis, which is unexpected in a
chemistry thesis, and a few circuit diagrams (ditto).

Ok fine, that's why I went into industry.

I was recommended for a professors position when I was 19 or so,
but I deferred and sought industry.

Newton had to wait until he was 27 before he got a similar offer. It's
a pity Newton made the wrong choice - he could well have been the
world's greatest TV repairer and installer (after he'd managed to
invent TV).

Well, freedom of choice is difficult for young people (I have 2 kids
and 2 grand kids), and spacetime permits one life path.

A paradigm shift forces top brains to reprogram, or retire.

You claim to have discovered something that would force a paradigm
shift - like many other amateur physicists - but you have failed to
persuade anybody in the business that it is a valid discovery. You
haven't been able to get it published in any of the peer-reviewed
journals - even the struggling fringe with tiny impact factors (who
will usually publish anything they can get their hands) on figure that
your offering is so far off the wall that publishing it would destroy
whatever tiny shreds of reputation they've managed to build up.

What's required, is a specification dealing with an Advanced LIGO
null (that I find to be probable), in the event that occurs I have
made available some of the tools (most) to conduct a successful
paradigm shift.
That was the extent of the contract.

The contract to supply the tools to make a paradigm shift possible
must contain some interesting wording. Paradigm shifts are - by
definition - unpredictable, so a contract to supply the tools to
create such a shift would be amazingly unspecific.

It's a safety net, some might think GR is faulty if LIGO fails,
I find it's fine if one considers the exact details, and I'm
comfortable with that.

Since very few people seems to have noticed that this particular
paradigm shift has taken place, one might imagine that the paradigm
that has been shifted is entirely located between your ears, as some
kind of virtual paradigm shift appearing spontaneously in an
intellectual vacuum.

There's only about a dozen guys on the planet who can sense
the transpiration and understand the theoretics.
One who specialized in the subject of electronic GR, is likely cognizant.

It's all about electronics now.

On Feb 1, 5:17 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
....
Sloman, you have an unhealthy obsession with schooling,
is that a European thing?

The story you tell contains implausibilities. I'm high-lighting them.

Anyway I regard myself as a theoretician.
The government claims I'm a Doctor of mathematical physics,

From what institution? Which university library holds a copy of your
Ph.D. thesis? Can I get copy on microfilm from University Microfilms?

http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/brands/pl_umi.shtml

which seems to be the successor to University Mocrofilms, doesn't seem
to have anything written by Ken S Tucker.

My talent is trouble-shooting including complicated systems.

Maybe. That won't get you a Ph.D., though it is a useful talent to
have if you are trying to get a Ph.D. in an experimental science.

Well, freedom of choice is difficult for young people (I have 2 kids
and 2 grand kids), and spacetime permits one life path.

Newton may have been gay - he was certainly weird. Stephen Hawking -
who got the professorship that Newton once held when he (Hawking) was
37 - managed to combine an academic career with marriage, and had
three children, despite his health problems. A professor's salary is
usually large enough to support a family in comfort - I have personal
knowledge of plenty of examples.

It's a safety net, some might think GR is faulty if LIGO fails,
I find it's fine if one considers the exact details, and I'm
comfortable with that.

What's "fine if you consider the exact details"? You've claimed before
that there aren't any gravitational waves for LIGO to detect, so it's
situation would be anything but fine.

There's only about a dozen guys on the planet who can sense
the transpiration and understand the theoretics.
One who specialized in the subject of electronic GR, is likely cognizant.

Can you name one of these guys?

It's all about electronics now.

We'd all like to believe that, but you aren't exactly a credible
witness.

On Feb 1, 4:10 am, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Feb 1, 5:17 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
...
Sloman, you have an unhealthy obsession with schooling,
is that a European thing?

The story you tell contains implausibilities. I'm high-lighting them.

You're a victim of institutionalization, you seem to need to have a
govmonk sticker stuck on everyones forehead, humans are far
more versatile than you know.

Anyway I regard myself as a theoretician.
The government claims I'm a Doctor of mathematical physics,

From what institution? Which university library holds a copy of your
Ph.D. thesis? Can I get copy on microfilm from University Microfilms?

http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/brands/pl_umi.shtml

which seems to be the successor to University Mocrofilms, doesn't seem
to have anything written by Ken S Tucker.

Well Sloman you have communist affiliations, where privacy invasion
is  SOP, so you're not trustworthy. You can look up US copyright
#Tx4-323-943 (not classified), but it's 50 years beyond you.
(I'll test your research skills).

My talent is trouble-shooting including complicated systems.

Maybe. That won't get you a Ph.D., though it is a useful talent to
have if you are trying to get a Ph.D. in an experimental science.

You've certainly proved an inability to do independent research,
and that's driven you insane.

Well, freedom of choice is difficult for young people (I have 2 kids
and 2 grand kids), and spacetime permits one life path.

Newton may have been gay - he was certainly weird. Stephen Hawking -
who got the professorship that Newton once held when he (Hawking) was
37 - managed to combine an academic career with marriage, and had
three children, despite his health problems. A professor's salary is
usually large enough to support a family in comfort - I have personal
knowledge of plenty of examples.

Newton is regarded as a super-genius by historians.

He and I could pass as twins.

It's a safety net, some might think GR is faulty if LIGO fails,
I find it's fine if one considers the exact details, and I'm
comfortable with that.

What's "fine if you consider the exact details"? You've claimed before
that there aren't any gravitational waves for LIGO to detect, so it's
situation would be anything but fine.

It demands a more exacting mathematics.

There's only about a dozen guys on the planet who can sense
the transpiration and understand the theoretics.
One who specialized in the subject of electronic GR, is likely cognizant.

Can you name one of these guys?

Yes.

It's all about electronics now.

We'd all like to believe that, but you aren't exactly a credible
witness.

Crack a book.

On Feb 1, 10:34 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

On Feb 1, 4:10 am, Bill Sloman <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Feb 1, 5:17 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
...
Sloman, you have an unhealthy obsession with schooling,
is that a European thing?