Man-wai Chang
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:02 pm
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
--
@~@ You have the right to remain silent.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
JW
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:37 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:02:18 +0800 Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com>
wrote in Message id: <j2dpp0$udc$2_at_dont-email.me>:
Quote:
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
I answered this in SER.
Instead of multi-posting, crosspost.
Man-wai Chang
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:18 pm
Quote:
I answered this in SER.
Instead of multi-posting, crosspost.
You didn't answer the question.
--
@~@ You have the right to remain silent.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
銝鞎! 銝閰擉! 銝港漱! 銝鈭! 銝! 銝芣捏! 隢桃 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
John Fields
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:03 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:02:18 +0800, Man-wai Chang
<toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
---
toylet, you have just been flushed. :-)
--
JF
JW
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:34 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:03:00 -0500 John Fields
<jfields_at_austininstruments.com> wrote in Message id:
<mj1l4714if4dbr8l5kcn2bvepd918dll0r_at_4ax.com>:
Quote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:02:18 +0800, Man-wai Chang
toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com> wrote:
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
---
toylet, you have just been flushed.
<j2du83$uia$2_at_dont-email.me>
*sigh*
Methinks it's another troll.
JW
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:37 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:18:55 +0800 Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com>
wrote in Message id: <j2du8l$uia$3_at_dont-email.me>:
Quote:
I answered this in SER.
Instead of multi-posting, crosspost.
You didn't answer the question.
Sure I did, in SER. Put it in a microwave oven, but (obviously) don't turn
on the oven.
Michael Black
Guest
Tue Aug 16, 2011 9:22 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, JW wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:18:55 +0800 Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com
wrote in Message id: <j2du8l$uia$3_at_dont-email.me>:
I answered this in SER.
Instead of multi-posting, crosspost.
You didn't answer the question.
Sure I did, in SER. Put it in a microwave oven, but (obviously) don't turn
on the oven.
That's a brilliant solution. At least it had better be, or else things
will be cooking in the kitchen besides whatever is in the oven.
Michael
Man-wai Chang
Guest
Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:38 am
Quote:
You didn't answer the question.
Sure I did, in SER. Put it in a microwave oven, but (obviously) don't turn
on the oven.
Sorry for missing the last part and for my first impression about an
oven (always used to cook things).
OH well, I don't use microwave oven. It's too dangerous.
--
@~@ You have the right to remain silent.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
銝鞎! 銝閰擉! 銝港漱! 銝鈭! 銝! 銝芣捏! 隢桃 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Man-wai Chang
Guest
Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:39 am
Quote:
toylet, you have just been flushed.
*sigh*
Methinks it's another troll.
A good way to deny others from asking about secrets in electronics, I
suppose. :)
--
@~@ You have the right to remain silent.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
銝鞎! 銝閰擉! 銝港漱! 銝鈭! 銝! 銝芣捏! 隢桃 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
John Larkin
Guest
Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:07 pm
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:02:18 +0800, Man-wai Chang
<toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
Bucket of salt water works for me.
John
Man-wai Chang
Guest
Thu Aug 18, 2011 11:43 am
Quote:
Bucket of salt water works for me.
Are you trying to destroy the phone, rather than just shielding it from RF?
--
@~@ You have the right to remain silent.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
銝鞎! 銝閰擉! 銝港漱! 銝鈭! 銝! 銝芣捏! 隢桃 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
T
Guest
Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:10 pm
In article <j2dpp0$udc$2_at_dont-email.me>, toylet.toylet_at_gmail.com says...
Quote:
I threw it into a tin can then invert it. It still rang when I dialed
its number.
Must I use aluminium foil? Why does Al make a difference?
Funny story. We found out that the grounds in our office are miswired
due to testing the device.
Someone built a box, lined with copper mesh and had a three prong plug
on a cord coming out of it. When properly grounded it definitely kills
RF for the device inside the box. But in our office no such luck.
Probably because of the UPS on the back side of the outlets.