CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 yea

CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fer=
milab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
It is doing exactly what its operators want it to do, demonstrating
that all the sub-systems are doing what they are supposed to when
operating under a substantial proportion of the design load

It isn't doing what the theoritical phsycists would like it to do,
which is to start working at its design energy right now, but happily
the slow and cautious brigade have got their wish.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

Regards,
Mikko

On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
It is doing exactly what its operators want it to do, demonstrating
that all the sub-systems are doing what they are supposed to when
operating under a substantial proportion of the design load

It isn't doing what the theoritical phsycists would like it to do,
which is to start working at its design energy right now, but happily
the slow and cautious brigade have got their wish.

On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:30 -0800 (PST)) it happenedBill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote in
1bf0037f-80ee-4bf7-9fd3-924c7ecc8...@3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>:



On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fer> >milab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
It is doing exactly what its operators want it to do, demonstrating
that all the sub-systems are doing what they are supposed to when
operating under a substantial proportion of the design load

It isn't doing what the theoritical phsycists would like it to do,
which is to start working at its design energy right now, but happily
the slow and cautious brigade have got their wish.

Well if you designed a 100 W RMS amplifier, and it only delivered 50 W,
and was payed such a large amount of money for it, it would be called fraud.

Almost as much fraud as global heating.

A political social project to keep the brain dead scientist,
who never in all these years came closer to understanding
gravity, fusion, or a better weapon, busy.

Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

  After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:

Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

 After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

 Regards,
          Mikko

Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.

On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:

Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

 After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

 Regards,
          Mikko

Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.

Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots. It is a
pity he doesn't have the same hands-on familiarity with mathematics
and science, but the daft ideas that he espouses must make it
difficult for him to make sense of these subjects.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.

On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:30 -0800 (PST)) it happened Bill Sloman
bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote in
1bf0037f-80ee-4bf7-9fd3-924c7ecc8390_at_3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>:

On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fer=
milab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
It is doing exactly what its operators want it to do, demonstrating
that all the sub-systems are doing what they are supposed to when
operating under a substantial proportion of the design load

It isn't doing what the theoritical phsycists would like it to do,
which is to start working at its design energy right now, but happily
the slow and cautious brigade have got their wish.

Well if you designed a 100 W RMS amplifier, and it only delivered 50 W,
and was payed such a large amount of money for it, it would be called fraud.

Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

On Feb 5, 4:57 pm, Okkim Atnarivik
Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.

  After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.

A nice theory, but not original.

Bill Sloman wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.

LOL
What a joke.

3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up

The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
It is doing exactly what its operators want it to do, demonstrating
that all the sub-systems are doing what they are supposed to when
operating under a substantial proportion of the design load

It isn't doing what the theoritical phsycists would like it to do,
which is to start working at its design energy right now, but happily
the slow and cautious brigade have got their wish.

The real disaster is waiting to happen - no new physics at all even at
full power. Can you imagine what the next request for an even more
powerful and more expensive machine will sound like after that?