elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 yea
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
John Fields
Guest
Guest
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:44 pm
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
JF
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:19 am
It seems to be working just fine even at half power. The resulting black
hole seems to be consuming funds quite efficiently.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul_at_Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
~{po ~poz~ppo\anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:25 am
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:47:53 -0800 (PST)) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote in
<14142fc2-aa93-418c-8a41-71bd66d09016_at_z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>:
Quote:
1:0
Actually, you recognised me as someone who hadn't fallen for the Exxon-
Mobil propaganda
Actually, you recognised me as someone who hadn't fallen for the Exxon-
Mobil propaganda
Poor Billy,
Exxon Mobil is *against* global warming as I tried to explain to your last remaining neuron,
because if it is cold they sell more fuel and the fuel price goes up.
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:38 am
On Feb 5, 8:09 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:30 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.
LOL
What a joke.
3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up
The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
---
Then your contention is that the blow-up was planned?
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:03 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/science/05collide.html?ref=science
Will run only at half power until 2012.
Not a much better search for the Higgs then the 7 years at 2 TeV that Fermilab already has.
LOL
What a joke.
3.5 TeV for two years may not be much better than 2 TeV for seven
years, but it is still better than nothing, which is what the
theortical physicists had when the super-conducting magnet blew up
The joke is your claim that Large Hadron Collider isn't working right.
---
Then your contention is that the blow-up was planned?
No - that it was the kind of teething trouble that you often run into
on large, complicated projects. Not an area you'd know much about.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:47 am
On Feb 5, 8:07 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST)) it happenedBill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote in
3a81e0f1-27ce-4252-8af6-86ee20883...@m31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots. It is a
pity he doesn't have the same hands-on familiarity with mathematics
and science, but the daft ideas that he espouses must make it
difficult for him to make sense of these subjects.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Well I recognised you as a climate idiot!
1:0
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote in
3a81e0f1-27ce-4252-8af6-86ee20883...@m31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots. It is a
pity he doesn't have the same hands-on familiarity with mathematics
and science, but the daft ideas that he espouses must make it
difficult for him to make sense of these subjects.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Well I recognised you as a climate idiot!
1:0
Actually, you recognised me as someone who hadn't fallen for the Exxon-
Mobil propaganda that you reliably retail. Since you do happen to be
intellectually restricted, you'd like to think that I'm an idiot
because I don't agree with you, when in fact only another a gullible
idiot could share your opinions.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:52 am
On Feb 5, 8:44 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
He'd like to think that I'm an idiot, in that same way that you'd like
to think that I don't know what I'm talking about.
Pity about that. The universe is a cruel hard place, and your
favourite illusions can't conceal the fact that you are both
regretably under-educated.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:53 am
On Feb 5, 8:30 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:09:23 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 4:57 pm, Okkim Atnarivik
Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
A nice theory, but not original.
---
So what?
None of your hydrophobic blather is original either, and yet you don't
seem to mind spewing it ad nauseam.
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 4:57 pm, Okkim Atnarivik
Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
A nice theory, but not original.
---
So what?
None of your hydrophobic blather is original either, and yet you don't
seem to mind spewing it ad nauseam.
Not a contention that you have actually proved, and not a contention
that you would be equipped to prove if it happened to be correct
(which it isn't).
You may know everything that there is to know about the 555 - except
which modern devices do its job better - but you don't know much about
anything else, as you frequently take pains to tell us.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:17 am
John Fields wrote:
Quote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Well if you designed a 100 W RMS amplifier, and it only delivered 50 W,
and was payed such a large amount of money for it, it would be called fraud.
Especially if, after it got to 50 watts out, it blew up.
Another of those 'fabulous' Sloman designs?
--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:21 am
John Fields wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
Someone who is blind and deaf could pick him out, just by the
overpowering scent of a LOSER. :(
--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:18 am
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
Quote:
It seems to be working just fine even at half power. The resulting black
hole seems to be consuming funds quite efficiently.
It did a great job of sucking up what little was left of Bill's
brains.
--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:32 am
On Feb 6, 12:19 am, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <P...@Hovnanian.com> wrote:
Quote:
It seems to be working just fine even at half power. The resulting black
hole seems to be consuming funds quite efficiently.
hole seems to be consuming funds quite efficiently.
It has even generated a scientific paper or two, which is what it was
designed to do.
Jan Panteltje's little kopftje isn't really up to understanding
scientific papers - and John Fields hasn't shown any sign of
appreciating them either - so they do have a problem in seeing the
point of building the thing in the first place.
--
Bil Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:32 am
On Feb 6, 2:17 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Quote:
John Fields wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Well if you designed a 100 W RMS amplifier, and it only delivered 50 W,
and was payed such a large amount of money for it, it would be called fraud.
Especially if, after it got to 50 watts out, it blew up.
Another of those 'fabulous' Sloman designs?
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Well if you designed a 100 W RMS amplifier, and it only delivered 50 W,
and was payed such a large amount of money for it, it would be called fraud.
Especially if, after it got to 50 watts out, it blew up.
Another of those 'fabulous' Sloman designs?
As in one more fable invented by John Fields and enthusiastically
believed in by Mike Terrell.
The usual case of the dumb fantasist misleading the even dumber brown-
nose
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:32 am
On Feb 6, 2:21 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Quote:
John Fields wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
Someone who is blind and deaf could pick him out, just by the
overpowering scent of a LOSER.
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
Someone who is blind and deaf could pick him out, just by the
overpowering scent of a LOSER.
Michael Terrell - being a well-known winner, and widely touted as the
most successful member of his high-school graduating class - wouldn't
know what a loser smelled like, would he?
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bill Sloman
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:32 am
On Feb 6, 12:25 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:47:53 -0800 (PST)) it happenedBill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote in
14142fc2-aa93-418c-8a41-71bd66d09...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>:
1:0
Actually, you recognised me as someone who hadn't fallen for the Exxon-
Mobil propaganda
Poor Billy,
Exxon Mobil is *against* global warming as I tried to explain to your last remaining neuron,
because if it is cold they sell more fuel and the fuel price goes up.
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote in
14142fc2-aa93-418c-8a41-71bd66d09...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>:
1:0
Actually, you recognised me as someone who hadn't fallen for the Exxon-
Mobil propaganda
Poor Billy,
Exxon Mobil is *against* global warming as I tried to explain to your last remaining neuron,
because if it is cold they sell more fuel and the fuel price goes up.
Since the explanation - as I pointed out at the time - failed to take
into account the the fuel they sell to run air-conditioning units
(like the ones my wife and I have in our cars, even if your bicycle
doesn't feature this kind of luxury) it was just one more example of
your failure to understand what was actually going on, and now alos
reflects your incapacity to get your head around any new fact that
hasn't been organised into a seductive package by your friendlu=y loca
denialist web-site.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
John Fields
Guest
Guest
Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:54 pm
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:52:56 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman_at_ieee.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Feb 5, 8:44 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
He'd like to think that I'm an idiot, in that same way that you'd like
to think that I don't know what I'm talking about.
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:24:21 -0800 (PST),Bill Sloman
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:57:49 +0200 (EET)) it happened Okkim
Atnarivik <Okkim.Atnari...@twentyfour.fi.invalid> wrote in
hkhf5t$5e...@epityr.hut.fi>:
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 years.
After their cryogenic system failed, and after the incident of
some bird having made its nest within the accelerator (causing
a short circuit or something) I started hearing this theory:
Discovery of the Higgs boson will turn out to facilitate time
travel, and now the unverse is protecting causality.
In other words, the accelerator will never work.
Regards,
Mikko
Yes I have heard that theory too, from a Nobel winner at that IIRC.
Too many mathematicians and idiots in my view.
Jan Panteltje seems to be well-placed to recognise the idiots.
---
Well, he certainly seems to be able to easily pick you out of the
line-up of the usual suspects.
He'd like to think that I'm an idiot, in that same way that you'd like
to think that I don't know what I'm talking about.
---
Well, if that's the case, then we're _both_ right.
---
Quote:
Pity about that. The universe is a cruel hard place, and your
favourite illusions can't conceal the fact that you are both
regretably under-educated.
favourite illusions can't conceal the fact that you are both
regretably under-educated.
---
One with an adequate education shouldn't have to be told that
"regretably" is correctly spelled: 'regrettably'.
JF
elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Design - CERN's black hole cannon not working right for a other 2 yea
