Best solder free electrical connection

In message <yKKdnSL7cvt27ebRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>, Michael A.
Terrell <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> writes

geoff wrote:

In message ?GIednWu1m4SwUe_RnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com?, Michael A.
Terrell ?mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net? writes
?? ?? ???? What other supersonic airliners are those then?...
?? ?? ???
?? ?? ??? Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ??The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
?? ?? ??Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
?? ?? ??airliner.
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?I guess that answered my question (you don't read well).
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?The Concorde was not successful.
?? ??
?? ?? It was .. for what it did...
?? ?
?? ?
?? ? Well under a fraction of one percent isn't sucessful. It's nothing
?? ?but ego bloat.
??
?? Built here anyone;?..
?
?
? How's your space agency doing? How do they like the US built
?communications systems that i built?

All by yourself, big boi ?

or was that just the solder joints ?


Is that your best attempt at an insult? The only solder work I did
was to troubleshoot some boards. There were two complete ground
stations. One fixed, one mobile. They were shipped to Italy. The last
I heard, they wanted a second mobile ground station because the ESA
facility was so small. That caused front end overload at launch for the
fixed station. A good +60 dB above what they specified in their
purchase order.

I worked in production test & engineering on that project.

So, not design, a back end boi then

In message <yKKdnVz7cvv97ObRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>, Michael A.
Terrell <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> writes

?? ?? Yawn ... zzzzzz Frank Writtle was 'working on them long before
that;)...
?? ?
?? ?
?? ? So, where are his flying, today?
??
?? Well thats like saying where are Stevenson's locomotives working today
?? then;?.
??
?? Rather pointless...
?
?
? Yes, you are. Yet you keep trolling.

Do you even know who Sir Frank Whittle was ?


Tell me why I should care?

Well you wouldn't, would you?

you'd prefer to remain an ignorant septic

geoff wrote:

In message <yKKdnSL7cvt27ebRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>, Michael A.
Terrell <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> writes

geoff wrote:

In message ?GIednWu1m4SwUe_RnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com?, Michael A.
Terrell ?mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net? writes
?? ?? ???? What other supersonic airliners are those then?...
?? ?? ???
?? ?? ??? Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ??The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
?? ?? ??Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a
supersonic
?? ?? ??airliner.
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?I guess that answered my question (you don't read well).
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?The Concorde was not successful.
?? ??
?? ?? It was .. for what it did...
?? ?
?? ?
?? ? Well under a fraction of one percent isn't sucessful. It's nothing
?? ?but ego bloat.
??
?? Built here anyone;?..
?
?
? How's your space agency doing? How do they like the US built
?communications systems that i built?

All by yourself, big boi ?

or was that just the solder joints ?


Is that your best attempt at an insult? The only solder work I did
was to troubleshoot some boards. There were two complete ground
stations. One fixed, one mobile. They were shipped to Italy. The last
I heard, they wanted a second mobile ground station because the ESA
facility was so small. That caused front end overload at launch for the
fixed station. A good +60 dB above what they specified in their
purchase order.

I worked in production test & engineering on that project.

So, not design, a back end boi then


Yawn. I wrote ECOs.

Jumped up tech author then

geoff wrote:

In message <yKKdnVz7cvv97ObRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d_at_earthlink.com>, Michael A.
Terrell <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> writes

?? ?? Yawn ... zzzzzz Frank Writtle was 'working on them long before
that;)...
?? ?
?? ?
?? ? So, where are his flying, today?
??
?? Well thats like saying where are Stevenson's locomotives working today
?? then;?.
??
?? Rather pointless...
?
?
? Yes, you are. Yet you keep trolling.

Do you even know who Sir Frank Whittle was ?


Tell me why I should care?

Well you wouldn't, would you?

you'd prefer to remain an ignorant septic


yawn

As I said

Yet you can find both sitting on the side of the road, with steam
pouring out from under the hood.

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Yet you can find both sitting on the side of the road, with steam
pouring out from under the hood. :)

Aah, both are outfitted with a wood-carburettor....
but the Fiesta will drive sooner, and longer

Really? You have the Fiesta, when you scrap the Ford.

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Really? You have the Fiesta, when you scrap the Ford. :(

I don't remember a time when Ford was good in eu. In the seventies they
had nice looking cars and comfy, but the fuel consumption was too high
and they had rust problems. People drove 20l/100KM Fords in the
seventies, with a price of 11.7 Schilling per liter gasoline, that is
approximately a dollar today.
Today Fords are ugly and crappy (cheap though).

I go well with a II Golf/Jetta (built 1983-92). Affordable parts,
well-grounded design makes repair easy, light chassis and an
unbelieveable life-span.... not to mention the overdose of wax they
spent to the cavities. But only from 88-92, before they had also rust
problems.
Mine (1990 Jetta, 90HP, 1.8litres) is similar looking to the america
edition, but 200 Kilo lighter and some HP less. 6.4litres/100KM
minimum; 7 to 7.5 litres nominally .