EDAboard.com | EDAboard.de | EDAboard.co.uk | WTWH Media

Apple throttled your iPhone by cutting its speed almost in H

Ask a question - edaboard.com

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Repair Electronics - Apple throttled your iPhone by cutting its speed almost in H

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 18, 19, 20  Next

Harry Newton
Guest

Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:51 am   



On 11 Jan 2018 22:17:29 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Quote:
Apple didn't say anything even close to that silly claim, and you
haven't provided anything but blogger opinion pieces devoid of factual
information to back it up.


Facts threaten your belief system - not mine.

"Apple did not inform them of, or seek their consent to
installation of, performance-throttling software when presenting
them with the iOS 10.2.1 or 11.2 updates, or both of them,
plaintiff and the putative class members did not consent to
Apple's interference"

<http://www.zdnet.com/article/iphone-throttling-class-actions-pile-up-as-apple-hit-with-32nd-lawsuit/>

Harry Newton
Guest

Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:53 am   



On 11 Jan 2018 21:37:25 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Quote:
Blogger opinion pieces aren't facts. The reality is most iPhones run
just fine for 3-5 years on the OEM battery, as anyone who has owned one
for more than a fucking year knows. Try harder. Your trolls are useless
and lame.


Only you defend Apple's bonehead decisions to secretly "limit peak
performance" (aka "cap CPU speeds at less than half) on the iPhone.

"Who at Apple okayed the idea of throttling older iPhones in the
first place? Not only that, but they went a step further and decided
not to tell anyone that iOS contained code that deliberately slowed
down iPhones whose batteries were showing signs of wear. To say
that this was boneheaded is putting it mildly."

"The solution that Apple came up with for iPhones randomly restarting
was a clever one [but] the way it was implemented, and the fact that
it was kept a secret from users, leaves me shaking my head in
disbelief."

<http://www.zdnet.com/article/can-apple-dig-itself-out-of-the-iphone-throttling-hole-it-created-for-itself/>

Harry Newton
Guest

Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:55 am   



On 11 Jan 2018 21:40:27 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Quote:
And Apple's customers appreciate it. Meanwhile trolls like you can't
stand it, which is why you are here in the Apple newsgroups trolling
about it to begin with.


I only speak facts.
Facts don't undermine my belief system - they support it.

Facts undermine *your* belief system - not mine.

"How no one at Apple thought that this would not come to light, and
that the revelation would later snowball into lawsuits and Senate
committee probes is just beyond me."

"Rather than saying sorry, [the apology] feels as though Apple is
lecturing users about how it knows best, and that pushing out
updates that quietly hobbled devices was the right thing to do.
It wasn't."

<http://www.zdnet.com/article/can-apple-dig-itself-out-of-the-iphone-throttling-hole-it-created-for-itself/>

Harry Newton
Guest

Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:56 am   



On 11 Jan 2018 22:20:30 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Quote:
Blogger opinion pieces devoid of facts aren't evidence of a widespread
battery failure in under a year. Anyone who has owned an iPhone for
longer than a year know you're full of shit.


I realize facts hurt you because facts undermine your belief system.

"Trust in Apple is now shattered, and it feels like no one at
the company cares.

<http://www.zdnet.com/article/can-apple-dig-itself-out-of-the-iphone-throttling-hole-it-created-for-itself/>

Kees Nuyt
Guest

Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:55 am   



On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:07:02 +0000 (UTC), Harry Newton
<harryne_wton_at_AlliOSusersJustGiveUp.com> wrote:

Quote:

Bearing in mind the Orwellian doublespeak of "peak performance" really
means halving the CPU speeds...

"In other words, Apple decided on behalf of its customers that they'd
prefer an iPhone that performed worse for the same amount of time,
than an iPhone that performed just as well for a shorter amount of
time. It's a decision that does nothing to dispel the characterization
of Apple as a company that does what it can to push customers into
buying new phones."
https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/11/16878412/iphone-slowdown-battery-replacement-wait-times-6-plus-supply-shortage


Can you please keep this discussion about Apple products
out of comp.mobile.android? It's off topic here.

I also urge any responders to these apple threads to remove
comp.mobile.android from the "Newsgroups:" header.

Thanks in advance.
--
Kees Nuyt

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:25 pm   



On 1/11/18, 11:14 AM, in article p389h9$nrn$2_at_gioia.aioe.org, "Harry Newton"
<harryne_wton_at_AlliOSusersJustGiveUp.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:06:58 -0600, Fox's Mercantile wrote:

Damn,you're an ignorant cunt.

Snit - try to add technical on-topic value for once in your life.

Let's see, from your very next post, whether you're even *capable* of
adding on-topic technical value to this thread.


You pretend to not value my input but repeatedly bring my name up to try to
pull me into conversations.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:25 pm   



On 1/11/18, 11:20 AM, in article
1YGdnVtlj-twN8rHnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d_at_giganews.com, "Fox's Mercantile"
<jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

Quote:
On 1/11/18 11:28 AM, Harry Newton wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:52:42 -0600, Fox's Mercantile wrote:

Wrong again you ignorant cunt.

Why is it that the Apple Apologists resort to patently untrue insults
whenever confronted with items that shake their belief system?

To wit, I have multiple higher degrees, and I don't have a vagina.

:)


I am not Snit you fucking moron.
Fuck you and your alleged degrees.


Harry values my input. As much as he attacks me and lies about me, he learns
from me.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:26 pm   



On 1/11/18, 11:21 AM, in article
1YGdnVplj-umNsrHnZ2dnUU7-e8AAAAA_at_giganews.com, "Fox's Mercantile"
<jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

Quote:
On 1/11/18 11:28 AM, Harry Newton wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:50:41 -0600, Fox's Mercantile wrote:

You ignorant cunt. to paraphrase the replies during the
McCarthy witch hunts, "I am not now, nor have I ever been, Snit."

Unlike you, I do not hide behind an anonymous name that changes
constantly.

Although I'm touched that you find it necessary to attack me.
You are Snit.

What part of "I'm not snit" do you fail to grasp?


He merely wants me to post more so he can learn more. He will never directly
admit it but he knows my posts teach him a lot about technology.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:26 pm   



On 1/11/18, 12:20 PM, in article 67ef5dt698tsrum83cd2v1e2qci9vs5bo8_at_4ax.com,
"BK_at_Onramp.net" <BK_at_Onramp.net> wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:13:16 -0700, Snit
usenet_at_gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

On 1/11/18, 9:15 AM, in article qb3f5dddra0v0km4sr8a7kgbipjhmkdreb_at_4ax.com,
"BK_at_Onramp.net" <BK_at_Onramp.net> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:53:36 -0600, Fox's Mercantile <jdangus_at_att.net
wrote:

On 1/11/18 9:09 AM, Harry Newton wrote:
Bear in mind that Fox' Mercantile is the utter moron Snit

Wrong again you ignorant cunt.

Could you repeat this message? I only have three of them. :-)

He is merely responding to Harry's lies, which are repeated far more than
just three times.

I was just pulling his chain.


Of course.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:28 pm   



On 1/11/18, 11:22 AM, in article
1YGdnVVlj-vhNsrHnZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d_at_giganews.com, "Fox's Mercantile"
<jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

Quote:
On 1/11/18 12:14 PM, Harry Newton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:06:58 -0600, Fox's Mercantile wrote:

Damn,you're an ignorant cunt.

Snit - try to add technical on-topic value for once in your life.

Let's see, from your very next post, whether you're even *capable* of
adding on-topic technical value to this thread.


You haven't added any since the beginning.

And I'm NOT Snit
Get that through your thick skull.

Harry claims to not lie, but he lies in his every post.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Fox's Mercantile
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:08 pm   



On 1/14/18 11:28 AM, Snit wrote:
Quote:
On 1/11/18, 11:22 AM, "Fox's Mercantile" <jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

And I'm NOT Snit
Get that through your thick skull.

Harry claims to not lie, but he lies in his every post.


Well yeah. And at least you're not claiming to be me. ;-)


--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

Snit
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:13 pm   



On 1/14/18, 11:08 AM, in article
lfednXuz0IYTAcbHnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d_at_giganews.com, "Fox's Mercantile"
<jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

Quote:
On 1/14/18 11:28 AM, Snit wrote:
On 1/11/18, 11:22 AM, "Fox's Mercantile" <jdangus_at_att.net> wrote:

And I'm NOT Snit
Get that through your thick skull.

Harry claims to not lie, but he lies in his every post.

Well yeah. And at least you're not claiming to be me. ;-)

Not yet. Smile




--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

pfjw@aol.com
Guest

Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:32 pm   



What is clear is that Jimmy Neutron, Alias Mr. Rogers, alias... and so on, has managed to generate 283 posts, including this one, to his bubbling slime. Including repeat business.

The horse is dead, thoroughly picked over, and should be allowed to dissipate into nothingness. Please do not be just another maggot and continue to feed on the rotting remains.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

Harold Newton
Guest

Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:17 am   



Apple CEO Tim Cook Says Power Management Feature in Older iPhones Will Be
Able to Be Turned Off in Future Update
<https://www.macrumors.com/2018/01/17/tim-cook-on-iphone-battery-controversy/>

"Previously there was no clear notice that it would cause devices
to operate slowly."

"Cook says Apple will also allow customers to turn off the power
management feature ... first in a developer release that happens
next month."

"We will tell someone we're reducing your performance ...and if you
don't want it, you can turn it off."

rickman
Guest

Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:15 am   



Harry Newton wrote on 1/11/2018 2:02 PM:
Quote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:06:34 -0500, nospam wrote:

there isn't anything to fix.

Rickman,

I was trying to hint to you that nospam is *different* than the other half
dozen fundamentalist Apple Apologists.
*Jolly Roger, Lewis, nospam, BKonRamp, Savageduck, Hemidactylus, etc.*

He actually doesn't believe a thing he says (because he knows the facts and
actually understands them, unlike the other Apple Apologists).

Always keep in mind that, while all half dozen of the die-hard Apple
Apologists have a belief system which is vulnerable to facts, nospam
actually *knows* his facts.

He simply has a propensity to flaty outright deny them.

Why?
You tell me why.

Here's what he does all the time:
rickman: Your equation of 1+1=3 is wrong; so it needs to be fixed.
nopsam: There isn't anything to fix.


I gave up reading this conversation some time back. I only read this
message out of idle curiosity. The conversation ended for all practical
purposes. There is no point in partaking in the meta-discussion, so I'm
out. If you keep arguing with them as to who is the bigger butt head,
that's on you.

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 18, 19, 20  Next

elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Repair Electronics - Apple throttled your iPhone by cutting its speed almost in H

Ask a question - edaboard.com

Arabic version Bulgarian version Catalan version Czech version Danish version German version Greek version English version Spanish version Finnish version French version Hindi version Croatian version Indonesian version Italian version Hebrew version Japanese version Korean version Lithuanian version Latvian version Dutch version Norwegian version Polish version Portuguese version Romanian version Russian version Slovak version Slovenian version Serbian version Swedish version Tagalog version Ukrainian version Vietnamese version Chinese version Turkish version
EDAboard.com map