30 amp transfer circuit for a small generator

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

See ya, toiletboy.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ujvbc6d4qpn9sgqrg3mpv36o1qeqpk9lhh_at_4ax.com...
---
An erroneously (or malevolentltly) top-posted post follows which was
repaired by bottom-posting it in order to preserve the natural
chronological order of events.
---
Piss off, you supercilious ass.

That post was a forgery, so let's talk about something else for a
while, OK?

Why do you persist in top-posting when all it does is create
confusion?

Unless you're terminally stupid you must realize that we read from
left to right and from top to bottom, with the beginning of the book
occurring first and the end occurring at, well, the end, not the
beginning.

Since it's obvious that you're not _terminally_ stupid, your continued
top-posting reflects the disdain you have for the other members of
these groups who have asked you, more than once, I'm sure, to do what
Romans do, when you're in Rome.

Your refusal, since you can offer no rational proof of top-posting's
superiority, smacks of narcissistic self-indulgence and all you'll do
by persisting with your perversion is alienating those who might
support you.

I'm certainly not impressed with your rather banal, smartass, 17 post
record on sed, especially with your: "Here, let me make it as
difficult for you as I possibly can to measure Zener diode reverse
breakdown voltage"

Ultimately, the decision to post the way the overwhelming majority of
us does is yours, and if you choose not to you'll more than likely be
handed short shrift.

---

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:02:51 -0400, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com> wrote:

Now you are a toilet???

Remember you can't read this so don't answer.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:ObOdnfOa_LhbZ1nRnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d_at_posted.toastnet...
Flush!

JF

BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this
thread. Grow up.

Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?

Josepi:

Then why would you want to start reading a post in the middle of the text,
moron?

Because I want to read what the author responds to.
It is not compulsory to answer to each line of a post.

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:07:09 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com
wrote:

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?

Usenet does have conventions, and bottom posting is one. However
some simple folk just don't get it, never will.

SOME ONE SHOULD CAPTURE HIM A PLACE HIM IN A ZOO
FAR FAR AWAY FROM ANY KIND OF USENET ACCESS

When you bottom post nobody knows where your text will start and have to
search for the beginning.

I can read text posted in any format, using the free MOE reader and I do.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:07:09 -0400, "Josepi" <JRM.@easynews.com
wrote:

Convention? ROFLMFAO. Usenet has no rules and no conventions.

Bottom posting was obsoleted with threading readers. I want to read top to
bottom, as the centruy old convention dictates.

Try to keep your name header with your text, huh? (like I have).

Special readers have been produced to try to make the bottom posting mess
readable. Why?


Yes, Usenet does have conventions, and bottom posting is one. However
some simple folk just don't get it, never will.

I DO NOT JUDGE POSTING FORMATS

IT DOESN'T UPSET THE CHILDREN OF THE LIGHT

AS MUCH
BESIDES SOME BROWSERS OPEN QUOTES UP TOP
MOST DOWN BELOW
WHAT LUCK

THAT DEMENTED TROGLODYTE THINKS THAT HIS IS ALL THERE IS

IT'S NOTHING TO GET HUNG ABOUT

I AM PROTEUS

Is this a killfiltering speed contest?

You can go first, anytime. Your responses were only a small irritant to me
and many others.

BTW: You bottom posting idiosyncracy has made a complete mess of this
thread. Grow up.

"John Fields" <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

news:dcfdc6lljvs7pf9rg9aspm0kju3if96vrp_at_4ax.com...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:41:23 -0400, "Josepi" <J...@easynews.com
wrote:

OK, Let's taught about how to use a killfilter.

---
"taught about"???
---

I assume you can smell the posts so you removed the killfilter to read my
post?

---
I don't recall having killfiled you, but I did catch the stench.
---

Why would you torture yourself with a top-posting idiot?. Ohhh I get it.
It's the "torturing yourself" part.

---
Yeah, you're right.

There's been nothing of substances in any of your posts, so slogging
through them, particularly since they're chronologically out of order
is, while not torture, at least disappointing.

I should probably stop.
---

Please return it to the natural state...killed.

---
Sorry, but no.

I very rarely killfile anyone, especially the self-admitted
top-posting idiots whom I like to take pot-shots at occasionally.

---
JF